Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and reasonably concise, with a clear three-phase workflow, but it lacks executable templates and the registry-snippet format, and it has no validation checkpoints for the registry-mutation step.
Suggestions
Provide a concrete README.md template and the exact 'Snippet de Registro' line format so output is copy-paste ready.
Add a validation checkpoint in FASE 3 (e.g. verify the new skill is recognized by the Orquestador / registry parses) before declaring the deploy complete.
Replace the tautological 'When to Use' with explicit trigger conditions, and drop the 'Descripción' section that duplicates the frontmatter.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with headers, bullet points, and phased structure; only minor instances of padding (the 'Descripción' section restates the frontmatter and 'When to Use' is tautological) could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The three phases give concrete direction (solicit 3 pilares, generate README + registry snippet, create folder and update registry), but key details are missing — no README template, no actual format for the 'Snippet de Registro', and the Example shows only a user request with no expected output. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases and sub-steps are clearly sequenced, but there are no validation or verification checkpoints (e.g. confirm the registry entry parses, verify the skill loads) for a workflow that mutates the master registry. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-file with no external references needed, and is well-organized into clear sections (When to Use, Descripción, Instrucciones, Flujo de Trabajo, Reglas de Oro, Example, Limitations). | 5 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |