Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A rigorous, well-sequenced experimentation guide with strong validation gates and an executable sample-size example. Its main weaknesses are redundancy across admonition sections and a lack of file-level progressive disclosure for a skill of this length.
Suggestions
Consolidate the 'Key Principles (Non-Negotiable)' recap and the repeated MUST/DO NOT language into the existing gates to remove redundancy and trim length.
Move the full sample-size calculation and/or worked example into a separate references file (e.g. references/sample-size.md) linked from the main body, since the skill exceeds the 50-line simple-skill threshold.
Add a concrete, executable check or code snippet for sample-ratio mismatch (SRM) verification rather than leaving it as a qualitative instruction.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and free of conceptual fluff, but redundant sections (e.g. 'Key Principles (Non-Negotiable)' rehashing earlier gates) and repeated MUST/DO NOT emphasis could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste-ready Python sample with expected output plus concrete tracking checks and refusal conditions, though some verification steps (SRM, guardrail dashboards) remain qualitative rather than executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered sequence with explicit validation gates (Hypothesis Lock, Tracking Verification before Gate 8, Execution Readiness Hard Stop), feedback loops ('stop and resolve'), and checklists throughout. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Internal sections are well-headed and navigable, but the ~290-line skill is monolithic with no external reference files and inlines the sample-size and worked examples that could be split out. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |