Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers a clear, actionable routing procedure with strong error-handling boundaries, appropriate for a thin MCP-verb wrapper. Its weaknesses are redundancy — the When to Use and Example sections restate the description — and elided parameters that keep the guidance just short of fully executable.
Suggestions
Delete or replace the Example section (it only re-quotes the description) with a real worked example showing an acc_act solve call, a sample brain_frame response, and the matching continue submission.
Remove the verbatim description duplication in When to Use and keep only the branch-specific guidance that is new information.
Specify the acc_act(runtime="outcome", ...) parameters and what a valid proposal_text looks like so all three verbs have complete invocation shapes.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The steps and Execution boundaries are lean, but the When to Use section repeats the frontmatter description verbatim ("Use this skill when you need route a goal through acc's scored-memory loop..."), and the Example section merely re-quotes that description as a fake user request, adding no value. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete calls — `acc_act(runtime="solve", input="<the goal>")`, `acc_act(runtime="continue", input={"frame_id": ..., "submit_token": ..., "proposal_text": ...})` — plus the exact `PREDICT: <0.00-1.00> <why>` format, but ellipsis placeholders and the unspecified `acc_act(runtime="outcome", ...)` parameters leave minor gaps versus copy-paste-ready guidance. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-step sequence with branch handling (final vs brain_frame), explicit stop conditions ("Stop when the user cancels, the tool fails, or a frame needs unavailable input") and retry-safety rules ("A retry is safe only when the actual integration confirms its idempotency contract"), but the outcome-closure step and malformed-frame handling are underspecified. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short (~45-line) skill with no bundle files and well-organized sections (When to Use, steps, Example, Limitations, Execution boundaries); the vacuous Example section and undocumented concepts like 'commitment id' and 'Work Model' leave minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |