Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers a tight, highly actionable clarification workflow with concrete templates and a worked example that leaves no ambiguity about what to do. The only deductions are minor: some redundancy across the Limitations, Anti-patterns, and When NOT to Use sections, and a confirm step that proceeds without explicit user validation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and imperative with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but "Limitations" ("Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs... are missing") and parts of "Anti-patterns" restate content already covered in "When NOT to Use" and the Goal, which could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete question templates ("Before I start, I need: (1) ..."), a fully worked reply-format example block, and explicit mechanics like the `defaults` fast-path and `1b 2a 3c` responses give copy-paste-ready guidance covering the common cases for an instruction-only skill. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four steps are clearly sequenced with a pause checkpoint ("Do not run commands, edit files... until must-have answers arrive") and a confirm step, but step 4 says to restate requirements and "then start work" without explicitly waiting for the user to validate the restatement — a minor validation gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist or are needed; the single file is well-organized into scannable sections (When to Use, When NOT to Use, Goal, Workflow, Question templates, Anti-patterns, Limitations) that make navigation easy, satisfying the simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |