Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured overview that delegates detail appropriately to a single, verified, one-level-deep reference, with strong and specific safety constraints. Its weaknesses are the absence of any concrete pattern or quick-start example inline and the lack of an explicit step sequence with validation checkpoints in the body itself.
Suggestions
Add a brief quick-start section inline (e.g., a minimal agent-loop skeleton or the key design checklist) so the skill is actionable without first opening the reference.
Convert the dense run-on prose in 'Authorization and implementation limits' into bulleted, scannable rules so they are easier to apply and verify.
State an explicit short workflow (read guide -> select patterns -> apply constraints -> validate output) with validation checkpoints instead of implying them through the reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — a delegation pointer, a when-to-use list, and dense constraint prose with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows. Minor redundancy keeps it below 5: the blockquote restates the description verbatim, and the run-on safety paragraphs in 'Authorization and implementation limits' could be tightened into scannable bullets. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The body contains genuinely concrete directives ('reject escaping/symlink paths', 'validate schemas and budget all tool/LLM calls', 'bind authorization to the concrete action, target, data and limits'), but all executable pattern and code content is deferred to the reference file, leaving the body's own steps at the high-hint level. Not 2 because the constraints are specific instructions rather than vague hints. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Delegation instructions are clear ('Read the detailed guide before executing this skill... for focused work, load the relevant sections; for end-to-end work, read the guide completely'), but the body presents no explicit step sequence or validation checkpoints — the sequence and checkpoints are implicit in the referenced guide. Matches anchor 3 ('sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit'); not 4, which requires a visible ordered workflow with most checkpoints present. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clear overview with a single, well-signaled, one-level-deep reference (references/detailed-guide.md, verified to exist and organized into 8 clearly headed sections), plus explicit guidance on loading it fully versus by section. This is a clean match for anchor 5: appropriate split, easy navigation, no nesting. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |