claude-code-guide

To provide a comprehensive reference for configuring and using Claude Code (the agentic coding tool) to its full potential. This skill synthesizes best practices, configuration templates, and advanced usage patterns.

Quality

45%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/claude-code-guide/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

46%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-sectioned and its one genuinely concrete artifact — the CLAUDE.md template — is copy-paste ready, but it is padded with duplicated and boilerplate sections and generic advice Claude already knows. Its biggest gap is actionability: for a Claude Code configuration guide it omits the tool-specific specifics (settings, slash commands, hooks, MCP) that would make the guidance executable.

Suggestions

Remove the duplicated Purpose section and the generic When to Use/Limitations boilerplate, and drop advice Claude already knows (e.g., using grep/find before reading files) to tighten token efficiency.

Add executable, Claude-Code-specific guidance: a settings.json example, key slash commands, and a hooks or MCP configuration snippet instead of abstract tips like 'be extremely specific about paths'.

Sequence the guidance into a coherent workflow (create CLAUDE.md → configure settings/hooks → iterate with the debugging steps), with a verification checkpoint such as running the test command after configuration changes.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The Purpose section repeats the frontmatter description verbatim, the When to Use and Limitations sections are generic boilerplate ("applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview"), and tips like "Use `grep` or `find` to locate relevant files first" explain things Claude already knows — several padded, unnecessary sections.	2 / 5
Actionability	The CLAUDE.md template and the thinking keywords are concrete and usable, but the rest is high-level direction ("Be extremely specific about paths, filenames") with no Claude-Code-specific executable detail such as settings.json examples, slash commands, hooks configuration, or MCP setup.	3 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The debugging section lists a rough 3-step sequence, but the skill overall is a collection of disconnected tips rather than a coherent ordered workflow, and no validation checkpoints are given; no destructive or batch operations are involved, so no lower cap applies.	3 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	No bundle files exist and the body is short with clearly labeled sections and no nested references, so structure is good; the duplicated Purpose and boilerplate sections are minor organization gaps that keep it below a 5.	4 / 5
	Total	12 / 20 Passed

Description

45%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description identifies its subject (Claude Code configuration) but relies on vague framing — "comprehensive reference", "to its full potential", "synthesizes best practices" — instead of concrete capabilities, and provides no 'Use when' trigger guidance. It would benefit most from naming specific actions and explicit trigger conditions.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause with concrete triggers, e.g., 'Use when setting up or improving Claude Code configuration, writing a CLAUDE.md, or tuning prompts, hooks, or settings for agentic coding.'

Replace vague phrases ('to its full potential', 'synthesizes best practices') with concrete capabilities such as 'Generates CLAUDE.md project templates, configures settings and hooks, and provides prompting and debugging patterns for Claude Code.'

Include natural keywords users would actually say — CLAUDE.md, settings.json, slash commands, hooks, MCP — to improve trigger matching and distinctiveness.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description names the domain ("configuring and using Claude Code") but its actions are generic — "synthesizes best practices, configuration templates, and advanced usage patterns" — and "to its full potential" is pure fluff; no concrete actions (e.g., create CLAUDE.md files, configure hooks) are stated.	2 / 5
Completeness	There is a moderately clear 'what' (a reference for configuring and using Claude Code), but the 'when' is entirely absent — no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3; it is not 4 because the 'when' is missing altogether rather than merely imprecise.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	"Claude Code" and "configuring" are natural terms a user would say, but common variations and synonyms are missing — CLAUDE.md, settings, slash commands, hooks, MCP — so keyword coverage is only partial.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Naming Claude Code gives it a specific niche, but "best practices" and "advanced usage patterns" overlap broadly with generic prompting/agent-usage skills and the absence of distinct triggers leaves real conflict risk.	3 / 5
	Total	11 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills
Path: skills/claude-code-guide/SKILL.md
Commit: 7b534bc

Reviewed: 5 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.