Content
51%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a clean progressive-disclosure stub: concise and well-organized, correctly offloading detail to a single clearly-signaled reference. Its weakness is that it carries no actionable or sequenced guidance itself, so actionability and workflow clarity depend entirely on the referenced guide.
Suggestions
Add a brief inline quick-start or a 3-4 step high-level workflow with at least one validation checkpoint so the body is actionable without forcing a full read of the guide.
Include one small concrete example (e.g., a minimal computer-use tool call or a sandboxing safety check) in the body to raise actionability.
Surface the key safety/validation steps from the guide as a short inline checklist, since this is a critical-risk skill where validation must not be hidden behind a reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-sectioned with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; the only trim candidate is the opening paragraph repeating the description nearly verbatim, keeping it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The body contains no concrete code, commands, or executable steps — it only routes the reader to the detailed guide ('Read the detailed guide before executing this skill'), matching the 'minimal concrete guidance; high-level hints' anchor; the actionable content lives in the reference file rather than the body. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | For a critical-risk, multi-step skill the body surfaces no sequenced workflow or validation checkpoints — it is a routing stub pointing at the guide; the rubric's cap-at-3 for missing validation applies, and the lack of even a rough in-body sequence pulls it to 2. | 2 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clear, lean overview that signals a single one-level-deep reference (references/detailed-guide.md, confirmed to exist and be well-sectioned at ~2158 lines) with a markdown link and explicit read instructions, matching the 'clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |