Content
27%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill is an exhaustive Brazilian criminal law reference document masquerading as a skill file. While it contains accurate and well-organized legal information with useful tables and a structured case analysis workflow, it is far too verbose (~700+ lines) and includes vast amounts of knowledge Claude already possesses. The content would benefit enormously from being split into multiple reference files with the SKILL.md serving as a concise overview with pointers.
Suggestions
Reduce SKILL.md to ~100 lines covering: when to activate, client profile identification, the 10-step workflow overview, key constraints, and victim safety protocols. Move all reference tables (legislation map, crimes/penalties, dosimetry, prescription, drug law, property crimes, execution benefits) to separate bundle files like LEGISLACAO.md, CRIMES_PENAS.md, DOSIMETRIA.md, etc.
Remove content Claude already knows: basic criminal law concepts (types of prison, excludentes de ilicitude, CPC articles on litigância de má-fé, basic statute of limitations rules). Focus only on domain-specific knowledge Claude wouldn't have, like the 2024-2025 legislative updates and specific STJ súmulas.
Add explicit validation checkpoints to the 10-step workflow, e.g., 'Before proceeding to Etapa 5 (Dosimetria), verify all applicable agravantes/atenuantes have been identified' and 'Before delivering Etapa 10 verdict, cross-check all cited articles against the legislation table.'
Add a concrete worked example showing the 10-step workflow applied to a real-world-style case (e.g., a Maria da Penha scenario) with the completed verdict template, so Claude has a clear model of expected output quality and format.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Extremely verbose at ~700+ lines. Contains massive reference tables that Claude already knows (basic criminal law concepts, prison types, statute of limitations tables, CPC articles). The entire content reads like a law textbook rather than a skill that adds what Claude doesn't already know. Much of this (e.g., explaining what 'furto simples' is, listing all excludentes de ilicitude) is knowledge Claude already possesses. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | The 10-step workflow for case analysis and the verdict template in Etapa 10 provide some concrete, actionable structure. However, most content is reference tables rather than executable guidance. The flowchart for victim assistance and the decision tables for identifying request types are useful but the skill lacks concrete examples of actual case analysis outputs. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 10-step case analysis workflow (Module 10) provides a clear sequence, and the victim assistance flowchart is well-structured. However, there are no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops — no steps like 'verify this before proceeding' or error recovery guidance. The workflow lacks verification steps for ensuring legal citations are correct or that the analysis is complete before delivering to the user. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Monolithic wall of text with no references to external files. All 15+ modules are crammed into a single SKILL.md with no progressive disclosure structure. Content like the full crimes table (Module 12), drug law details (Module 13), and execution benefits (Module 15) should be in separate reference files. No bundle files exist to support any separation. | 1 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |