CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

agent-orchestration-multi-agent-optimize

Optimize multi-agent systems with coordinated profiling, workload distribution, and cost-aware orchestration. Use when improving agent performance, throughput, or reliability.

53

Quality

60%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/agent-orchestration-multi-agent-optimize/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

42%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill is marketing-flavored padding around thin, non-executable code. The core intent and a basic workflow are present but buried under generic bullets and stub functions, with no reference files to offload detail.

Suggestions

Cut the marketing prose (Context/Core Capabilities) and vague bullet lists that restate known concepts; keep only instructions and concrete examples to raise conciseness.

Replace stub code (undefined semantic_truncate, PriorityQueue, PerformanceTracker, and the pass-only select_optimal_model) with complete, executable examples or remove them.

Add explicit validation checkpoints with rollback commands to the Instructions workflow, since the skill deploys orchestration changes that can cause system-wide regressions.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Noticeably verbose: padded marketing prose ('advanced AI-driven framework', 'cutting-edge AI orchestration techniques', 'holistically improve') and many bullet lists restating concepts Claude already knows, stretching well past 200 lines for a conceptually simple skill.

2 / 5

Actionability

Several code snippets are included, but most are non-executable stubs (semantic_truncate, PriorityQueue, PerformanceTracker are undefined) and select_optimal_model is a pass-only placeholder, leaving guidance incomplete rather than copy-paste ready.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A 4-step instruction list and two reference workflows are present with a validation/rollback mention, but steps are abstract and lack concrete checkpoints or error-recovery loops; the feedback-loop cap applies since the skill deploys batch orchestration changes.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Content is organized into numbered sections, but it is a single monolithic SKILL.md with no bundle files and no one-level-deep references, so structure exists yet detail is not offloaded to separate files.

3 / 5

Total

11

/

20

Passed

Description

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A solid third-person description that explicitly covers both what and when with natural trigger terms. Specificity is the weakest dimension because the action list is conceptual rather than concretely enumerated.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (multi-agent systems) and 2 concrete action clusters (profiling, workload distribution, cost-aware orchestration), but these are broad categories rather than tightly enumerated concrete actions like the score-4/5 anchors.

3 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Optimize multi-agent systems with coordinated profiling, workload distribution, and cost-aware orchestration') and when ('Use when improving agent performance, throughput, or reliability') with a concrete trigger phrase.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good coverage of natural terms a user would say ('multi-agent systems', 'agent performance', 'throughput', 'reliability'); a few common synonyms (e.g. agent swarms, latency tuning) are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche around multi-agent orchestration with distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk; minor overlap possible with general performance-tuning or single-agent optimization skills.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.