CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ai-md

Convert human-written CLAUDE.md into AI-native structured-label format. Battle-tested across 4 models. Same rules, fewer tokens, higher compliance.

33

Quality

30%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Risky

Do not use without reviewing

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/ai-md/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

27%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill contains genuinely valuable methodology for converting prose instructions to structured-label format, with real examples and a useful template. However, it is severely undermined by extreme verbosity — extensive theoretical explanations of LLM attention mechanisms, battle-testing narratives, and motivational framing that Claude doesn't need. The content would be far more effective at ~25% of its current length, with theory and results moved to separate reference files.

Suggestions

Cut the entire 'Why It Works' section (Mechanisms 1-3) — Claude doesn't need to understand attention theory to perform the conversion. If retained, move to a separate THEORY.md reference file.

Extract the 6-phase conversion process into a concise checklist format (trigger→action→constraint per line) and move detailed examples to an EXAMPLES.md file.

Remove all motivational/persuasive framing ('The uncomfortable truth', 'The paradox we proved', 'Non-Negotiable') — these are human-facing rhetoric that wastes tokens.

Split into at minimum 3 files: SKILL.md (concise overview + template + workflow), TECHNIQUES.md (special techniques), EXAMPLES.md (before/after conversions and test results).

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Extremely verbose at ~400+ lines. Extensively explains HOW and WHY LLMs process instructions (attention splitting, semantic anchoring) — concepts that are explanatory background, not actionable instructions. The 'Why It Works' section alone is pure theory that Claude doesn't need. Massive amounts of commentary, metaphors ('read like a compiler'), and motivational framing ('The uncomfortable truth') waste tokens.

1 / 3

Actionability

The 6-phase conversion process provides a concrete mental model with examples of input→output transformations, label vocabulary tables, and a template. However, much of it is descriptive rather than executable — there's no single concrete command or script to run the conversion. The bash snippet for token counting is executable, but the core conversion process is a manual methodology described in prose, not automatable steps.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The two-stage workflow (PREVIEW → DISTILL) and 6-phase conversion process provide a clear sequence. However, validation is described conceptually ('run multi-model test with 8 questions') without concrete validation commands or scripts. The testing phase describes a protocol but doesn't provide executable validation — it's more of a manual checklist. The backup step is good, but there's no automated rollback trigger on failure.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Everything is crammed into a single monolithic file with no bundle files or external references. The content spans theory, methodology, techniques, templates, anti-patterns, and results — all inline. The 'Why It Works' theory section, the detailed technique discoveries, and the results table could all be separate reference files. For a skill this long, the lack of any content splitting is a significant organizational failure.

1 / 3

Total

6

/

12

Passed

Description

32%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description identifies a specific conversion task (CLAUDE.md to structured-label format) but suffers from marketing language ('battle-tested', 'higher compliance') that adds no selection value. It critically lacks a 'Use when...' clause, making it difficult for Claude to know when to select this skill, and the trigger terms are too narrow and jargon-heavy to match natural user requests.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause, e.g., 'Use when the user wants to reformat, optimize, or compress their CLAUDE.md file, project instructions, or system prompt into a token-efficient structured format.'

Replace marketing fluff ('battle-tested across 4 models', 'higher compliance') with concrete actions like 'parses markdown rules, converts to labeled sections, removes redundant prose'.

Include natural trigger terms users might say, such as 'optimize CLAUDE.md', 'compress instructions', 'reformat rules', 'reduce token count', or 'structured prompt format'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It names the domain (CLAUDE.md conversion) and one action (convert to structured-label format), but doesn't list multiple concrete actions. The phrases 'battle-tested across 4 models' and 'fewer tokens, higher compliance' are marketing fluff rather than specific capabilities.

2 / 3

Completeness

It partially answers 'what' (convert CLAUDE.md to structured-label format) but completely lacks a 'Use when...' clause or any explicit trigger guidance. Per the rubric, a missing 'Use when...' clause caps completeness at 2, and the 'what' is also only partially clear, so this scores a 1.

1 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes 'CLAUDE.md' and 'structured-label format' which are relevant keywords, but misses common variations a user might say like 'reformat instructions', 'optimize system prompt', 'compress rules', or 'AI-readable format'. The term 'AI-native' is jargon that users are unlikely to use naturally.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The mention of 'CLAUDE.md' and 'structured-label format' provides some specificity, but the description could overlap with other skills related to formatting, converting, or optimizing configuration files or prompts. It's somewhat distinctive but not clearly delineated.

2 / 3

Total

7

/

12

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation9 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

skill_md_line_count

SKILL.md is long (524 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

9

/

11

Passed

Repository
sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.