anti-reversing-techniques
Understand anti-reversing, obfuscation, and protection techniques encountered during software analysis. Use when analyzing protected binaries, bypassing anti-debugging for authorized analysis, or u...
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i github:sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill anti-reversing-techniques77
Does it follow best practices?
If you maintain this skill, you can automatically optimize it using the tessl CLI to improve its score:
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./path/to/skillAgent success when using this skill
Validation for skill structure
Discovery
75%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This description has a clear niche in software protection analysis with explicit trigger guidance, making it complete and distinctive. However, the description appears truncated (ends with 'or u...') and could benefit from more natural user-facing trigger terms beyond technical jargon. The specificity of actions is moderate but limited by the truncation.
Suggestions
Complete the truncated description to show all intended use cases
Add more natural trigger terms users might say, such as 'packed executable', 'malware analysis', 'reverse engineering', 'unpacking', or 'deobfuscation'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (anti-reversing, obfuscation, protection techniques) and mentions some actions (analyzing protected binaries, bypassing anti-debugging), but the description is truncated and doesn't provide a comprehensive list of concrete actions. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what (understand anti-reversing, obfuscation, protection techniques) and when (Use when analyzing protected binaries, bypassing anti-debugging for authorized analysis). Has explicit 'Use when...' clause with trigger scenarios. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes relevant technical terms like 'anti-reversing', 'obfuscation', 'protection techniques', 'anti-debugging', and 'protected binaries', but these are somewhat technical jargon. Missing more natural user terms like 'packed executable', 'malware analysis', 'reverse engineering', 'crackme'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Very specific niche focused on software protection and anti-reversing techniques. Unlikely to conflict with general coding or document skills due to the specialized security/reverse engineering domain. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill excels at conciseness and appropriate content organization, with strong safety guardrails and clear use-case boundaries. However, it sacrifices actionability by deferring all concrete techniques to an external file, leaving the main skill as essentially a policy document rather than executable guidance. The workflow could benefit from explicit validation checkpoints given the sensitive nature of the work.
Suggestions
Add at least one concrete example of identifying a protection mechanism (e.g., detecting IsDebuggerPresent or common packer signatures) to improve actionability
Include explicit validation checkpoints in the workflow, such as 'Verify scope boundaries before each analysis step' or 'Confirm findings with secondary analysis method'
Consider adding a brief inline example of a safe analysis technique rather than deferring everything to the playbook
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient, avoiding unnecessary explanations of concepts Claude already knows. Every section serves a clear purpose without padding or verbose descriptions of what anti-reversing or obfuscation means. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides clear procedural guidance (confirm authorization, identify mechanisms, document findings) but lacks concrete code examples, specific commands, or executable techniques. The actual implementation details are deferred entirely to an external playbook. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 4-step instruction sequence is clear but lacks validation checkpoints or feedback loops. For security-sensitive analysis work, there should be explicit verification steps between identifying protections and proceeding with analysis. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill appropriately serves as an overview with clear navigation to the detailed implementation playbook. References are one level deep and well-signaled, with the main content appropriately split between overview and detailed techniques. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.