Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable instruction skill with a clear workflow and confirmation checkpoints, avoiding concept padding. It could be tightened slightly in its formatting prescriptions and made more concrete in a few abstract directives.
Suggestions
Condense the question-formatting guidance (lines 40-46) into a shorter list; the bolding/code-block tagging detail is over-prescriptive.
Add one concrete error-recovery checkpoint, e.g. 'If answers contradict each other or reveal new ambiguity, ask a follow-up before proceeding'.
Replace abstract directives like 'eliminate whole branches of work' with a brief concrete example of a branch-eliminating question.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is directive and assumes Claude's competence without explaining basic concepts, though the question-formatting sub-bullets (bolding, code-block tagging) are mildly over-prescriptive and could be trimmed, fitting the 4 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete question templates and a copy-paste reply-format example provide actionable guidance, but some instructions stay abstract ('Ask 1-5 questions', 'eliminate whole branches of work'), leaving minor gaps versus the fully executable 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step workflow is clearly sequenced with confirmation checkpoints (pause before acting, restate and confirm assumptions), but it lacks an explicit error-recovery feedback loop, matching the 4 rather than 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is organized into clearly labeled sections (When to Use, When NOT to Use, Goal, Workflow, Templates, Anti-patterns, Limitations) with no nested references and no need for external files, giving easy navigation appropriate to a single-file instruction skill. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |