Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable instruction skill with clear sequencing and concrete templates; its only weakness is mild redundancy and generic boilerplate in the closing sections.
Suggestions
Trim the "Limitations" section by removing the generic validation/expert-review boilerplate that is not specific to this skill.
Merge "Anti-patterns" into "When NOT to Use" to eliminate the duplication of the "don't ask what you can discover" guidance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and does not explain concepts Claude already knows, but the "Limitations" section contains generic boilerplate and "Anti-patterns" partly duplicates "When NOT to Use", so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance: numbered question templates, a `1b 2a 3c` compact reply format, a `defaults` fast-path, and a full example block. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step workflow is clearly sequenced with an explicit pause-checkpoint (step 3) and a confirmation feedback loop when the user asks to proceed without answers (step 3/4). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is self-contained with well-organized sections (When to Use, Workflow, Templates, Anti-patterns, Limitations) and no nested or external references, so no bundle structure is needed. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |