c4-component

Expert C4 Component-level documentation specialist. Synthesizes C4 Code-level documentation into Component-level architecture, defining component boundaries, interfaces, and relationships.

Quality

58%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/c4-component/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

50%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill provides a solid C4 Component documentation template with a concrete Mermaid example, but its instructions are generic boilerplate rather than task-specific guidance, the synthesis workflow lacks explicit sequencing and validation checkpoints, and its one external reference points to a missing file.

Suggestions

Replace the generic Instructions with a concrete, sequenced C4 component-synthesis workflow (e.g., 1. gather c4-code-*.md files, 2. group into logical components, 3. define boundaries/interfaces, 4. generate Mermaid diagram, 5. validate against code) with explicit checkpoints.

Remove or create the referenced 'resources/implementation-playbook.md' so the progressive-disclosure reference resolves to a real file; move the Master Component Index Template and Output Examples into it.

Tighten redundancy by merging 'Output Examples' with the template structure, and add domain-specific guidance on how to identify component boundaries rather than only placeholder scaffolding.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly efficient structural template content but includes redundant sections (e.g., 'Output Examples' restates the template structure) and generic boilerplate instructions that could be tightened, fitting the score-2 anchor of mostly efficient with some unnecessary content.	2 / 3
Actionability	It provides a concrete, copy-pasteable Mermaid C4Component example and a clear template structure, but the Instructions are generic boilerplate ('Clarify goals... Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes') and the actual component-synthesis methodology is only hinted at via example interactions, leaving key how-to details missing.	2 / 3
Workflow Clarity	An implicit sequence exists through the template sections, but the explicit Instructions are vague and not specific to the task, with only a generic 'validate outcomes' checkpoint and no concrete synthesis sequence, matching the score-2 anchor of steps present but checkpoints missing or implicit.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	Sections are reasonably organized, but the body is largely monolithic with content that could be separate (Master Component Index Template, Output Examples) inline, and the single external reference 'resources/implementation-playbook.md' points to a file that does not exist in the bundle, fitting the score-2 anchor.	2 / 3
	Total	8 / 12 Passed

Description

67%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and distinctive about its C4 Component-level niche, clearly stating what the skill does. Its main weakness is the absence of an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, which limits completeness and trigger-term quality.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause such as 'Use when creating C4 component-level documentation, synthesizing code-level docs into component architecture, or defining component boundaries and interfaces.'

Include more natural user-facing trigger terms (e.g., 'component diagram', 'component architecture', 'C4 component model') alongside the technical phrasing.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description lists multiple concrete actions — 'Synthesizes C4 Code-level documentation into Component-level architecture, defining component boundaries, interfaces, and relationships' — matching the score-3 anchor of multiple specific concrete actions in third person.	3 / 3
Completeness	It clearly answers 'what' (synthesizes code-level docs into component architecture, defining boundaries/interfaces/relationships) but omits an explicit 'when to use it' trigger clause; per the guidelines a missing 'Use when...' clause caps completeness at 2.	2 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Terms like 'C4 Component-level documentation' and 'component boundaries, interfaces, and relationships' are relevant to the niche but are somewhat technical and miss common natural variations a user might say; there is no 'Use when...' phrasing.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The 'C4 Component-level' framing is a clear, distinct niche unlikely to trigger for unrelated skills, matching the score-3 anchor of a clear niche with distinct triggers.	3 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
Path: skills/c4-component/SKILL.md
Commit: a3068b7

Reviewed: about 14 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.