CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

conductor-manage

Manage track lifecycle: archive, restore, delete, rename, and cleanup

36

Quality

32%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/conductor-manage/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

22%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill is essentially a thin wrapper that defers nearly all actionable content to an external playbook that isn't provided. It lacks concrete commands, executable examples, and clear workflows for any of the operations it claims to support. For a skill involving destructive operations like deletion and cleanup, the absence of explicit validation steps and feedback loops is a significant gap.

Suggestions

Add concrete, executable examples for at least the most common operations (e.g., archive a track, restore a track) with specific commands or file manipulation steps.

Include explicit step-by-step workflows with validation checkpoints for destructive operations (delete, cleanup), including backup verification before proceeding.

Provide the referenced `resources/implementation-playbook.md` as a bundle file, or inline the essential workflow details so the skill is self-contained enough to be actionable.

Remove generic boilerplate in the Limitations section and replace with skill-specific constraints or edge cases.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is relatively short but includes some unnecessary sections like 'Use this skill when' / 'Do not use this skill when' which are somewhat redundant with the description. The 'Limitations' section contains generic boilerplate that doesn't add value specific to this skill.

2 / 3

Actionability

The skill provides no concrete commands, code, or executable examples. Instructions like 'Verify conductor/ structure' and 'Determine the operation mode' are vague and abstract. There are no specific file paths, command formats, or examples of how to perform any of the listed operations (archive, restore, delete, rename, cleanup).

1 / 3

Workflow Clarity

For a skill involving destructive operations (delete, cleanup), there are no clear step-by-step workflows, no validation checkpoints, and no feedback loops. The instructions are high-level bullet points that defer all detail to an external playbook. 'Confirm destructive actions before applying' and 'Backup track data before delete operations' are mentioned but without any concrete mechanism.

1 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The skill references `resources/implementation-playbook.md` for detailed workflows, which is a reasonable one-level-deep reference. However, no bundle files were provided to verify the reference exists or is well-structured, and the SKILL.md itself provides almost no actionable content — it's essentially just a pointer to another file with minimal overview content.

2 / 3

Total

6

/

12

Passed

Description

42%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description effectively lists specific concrete actions (archive, restore, delete, rename, cleanup) but suffers from ambiguity around the domain term 'track' and completely lacks trigger guidance. Without a 'Use when...' clause or domain clarification, Claude would struggle to reliably select this skill from a large pool.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause specifying trigger scenarios, e.g., 'Use when the user wants to archive, restore, delete, or rename tracks in [specific system/context].'

Clarify what 'track' refers to (e.g., music tracks, project tracks, Linear tracks) to reduce ambiguity and conflict risk with other skills.

Include natural user phrases as trigger terms, such as 'remove a track', 'bring back archived track', or 'clean up old tracks'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: archive, restore, delete, rename, and cleanup. These are clear, actionable verbs describing what the skill does.

3 / 3

Completeness

Describes what the skill does but completely lacks a 'Use when...' clause or any explicit trigger guidance for when Claude should select this skill. Per rubric guidelines, a missing 'Use when...' clause should cap completeness at 2, and since the 'when' is entirely absent and the 'what' domain is ambiguous, this scores a 1.

1 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes relevant action keywords (archive, restore, delete, rename, cleanup) but the domain term 'track' is ambiguous—it could refer to music tracks, project tracks, issue tracks, etc. Missing natural user phrases like 'remove track', 'undo archive', or file type references.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The term 'track' is ambiguous and could overlap with music, project management, or other domains. The specific action verbs help somewhat, but 'delete', 'rename', and 'cleanup' are generic operations that could conflict with file management or other lifecycle skills.

2 / 3

Total

8

/

12

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.