tessl i github:sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill conductor-new-trackCreate a new track with specification and phased implementation plan
Create a new track (feature, bug fix, chore, or refactor) with a detailed specification and phased implementation plan.
resources/implementation-playbook.md.Verify Conductor is initialized:
conductor/product.md existsconductor/tech-stack.md existsconductor/workflow.md exists/conductor:setup firstLoad context files:
conductor/product.md for product contextconductor/tech-stack.md for technical contextconductor/workflow.md for TDD/commit preferencesDetermine track type based on description or ask user:
What type of track is this?
1. Feature - New functionality
2. Bug - Fix for existing issue
3. Chore - Maintenance, dependencies, config
4. Refactor - Code improvement without behavior changeCRITICAL RULES:
Q1: Feature Summary
Describe the feature in 1-2 sentences.
[If argument provided, confirm: "You want to: {argument}. Is this correct?"]Q2: User Story
Who benefits and how?
Format: As a [user type], I want to [action] so that [benefit].Q3: Acceptance Criteria
What must be true for this feature to be complete?
List 3-5 acceptance criteria (one per line):Q4: Dependencies
Does this depend on any existing code, APIs, or other tracks?
1. No dependencies
2. Depends on existing code (specify)
3. Depends on incomplete track (specify)Q5: Scope Boundaries
What is explicitly OUT of scope for this track?
(Helps prevent scope creep)Q6: Technical Considerations (optional)
Any specific technical approach or constraints?
(Press enter to skip)Q1: Bug Summary
What is broken?
[If argument provided, confirm]Q2: Steps to Reproduce
How can this bug be reproduced?
List steps:Q3: Expected vs Actual Behavior
What should happen vs what actually happens?Q4: Affected Areas
What parts of the system are affected?Q5: Root Cause Hypothesis (optional)
Any hypothesis about the cause?
(Press enter to skip)Q1: Task Summary
What needs to be done?
[If argument provided, confirm]Q2: Motivation
Why is this work needed?Q3: Success Criteria
How will we know this is complete?Q4: Risk Assessment
What could go wrong? Any risky changes?Generate track ID in format: {shortname}_{YYYYMMDD}
user-auth_20250115, nav-bug_20250115Validate uniqueness:
conductor/tracks.md for existing IDsuser-auth_20250115_2Create conductor/tracks/{trackId}/spec.md:
# Specification: {Track Title}
**Track ID:** {trackId}
**Type:** {Feature|Bug|Chore|Refactor}
**Created:** {YYYY-MM-DD}
**Status:** Draft
## Summary
{1-2 sentence summary}
## Context
{Product context from product.md relevant to this track}
## User Story (for features)
As a {user}, I want to {action} so that {benefit}.
## Problem Description (for bugs)
{Bug description, steps to reproduce}
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] {Criterion 1}
- [ ] {Criterion 2}
- [ ] {Criterion 3}
## Dependencies
{List dependencies or "None"}
## Out of Scope
{Explicit exclusions}
## Technical Notes
{Technical considerations or "None specified"}
---
_Generated by Conductor. Review and edit as needed._Display the generated spec and ask:
Here is the specification I've generated:
{spec content}
Is this specification correct?
1. Yes, proceed to plan generation
2. No, let me edit (opens for inline edits)
3. Start over with different inputsAfter spec approval, generate conductor/tracks/{trackId}/plan.md:
# Implementation Plan: {Track Title}
**Track ID:** {trackId}
**Spec:** [spec.md](./spec.md)
**Created:** {YYYY-MM-DD}
**Status:** [ ] Not Started
## Overview
{Brief summary of implementation approach}
## Phase 1: {Phase Name}
{Phase description}
### Tasks
- [ ] Task 1.1: {Description}
- [ ] Task 1.2: {Description}
- [ ] Task 1.3: {Description}
### Verification
- [ ] {Verification step for phase 1}
## Phase 2: {Phase Name}
{Phase description}
### Tasks
- [ ] Task 2.1: {Description}
- [ ] Task 2.2: {Description}
### Verification
- [ ] {Verification step for phase 2}
## Phase 3: {Phase Name} (if needed)
...
## Final Verification
- [ ] All acceptance criteria met
- [ ] Tests passing
- [ ] Documentation updated (if applicable)
- [ ] Ready for review
---
_Generated by Conductor. Tasks will be marked [~] in progress and [x] complete._Display the generated plan and ask:
Here is the implementation plan:
{plan content}
Is this plan correct?
1. Yes, create the track
2. No, let me edit (opens for inline edits)
3. Add more phases/tasks
4. Start overAfter plan approval:
Create directory structure:
conductor/tracks/{trackId}/
├── spec.md
├── plan.md
├── metadata.json
└── index.mdCreate metadata.json:
{
"id": "{trackId}",
"title": "{Track Title}",
"type": "feature|bug|chore|refactor",
"status": "pending",
"created": "ISO_TIMESTAMP",
"updated": "ISO_TIMESTAMP",
"phases": {
"total": N,
"completed": 0
},
"tasks": {
"total": M,
"completed": 0
}
}Create index.md:
# Track: {Track Title}
**ID:** {trackId}
**Status:** Pending
## Documents
- [Specification](./spec.md)
- [Implementation Plan](./plan.md)
## Progress
- Phases: 0/{N} complete
- Tasks: 0/{M} complete
## Quick Links
- [Back to Tracks](../../tracks.md)
- [Product Context](../../product.md)Register in conductor/tracks.md:
| [ ] | {trackId} | {title} | {created} | {created} |Update conductor/index.md:
Track created successfully!
Track ID: {trackId}
Location: conductor/tracks/{trackId}/
Files created:
- spec.md - Requirements specification
- plan.md - Phased implementation plan
- metadata.json - Track metadata
- index.md - Track navigation
Next steps:
1. Review spec.md and plan.md, make any edits
2. Run /conductor:implement {trackId} to start implementation
3. Run /conductor:status to see project progressIf you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.