tessl i github:sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill conductor-setupInitialize project with Conductor artifacts (product definition, tech stack, workflow, style guides)
Review Score
66%
Validation Score
13/16
Implementation Score
77%
Activation Score
33%
Initialize or resume Conductor project setup. This command creates foundational project documentation through interactive Q&A.
resources/implementation-playbook.md.Check if conductor/ directory already exists in the project root:
conductor/product.md exists: Ask user whether to resume setup or reinitializeconductor/setup_state.json exists with incomplete status: Offer to resume from last stepDetect project type by checking for existing indicators:
Load or create conductor/setup_state.json:
{
"status": "in_progress",
"project_type": "greenfield|brownfield",
"current_section": "product|guidelines|tech_stack|workflow|styleguides",
"current_question": 1,
"completed_sections": [],
"answers": {},
"files_created": [],
"started_at": "ISO_TIMESTAMP",
"last_updated": "ISO_TIMESTAMP"
}CRITICAL RULES:
setup_state.json after each successful stepQ1: Project Name
What is your project name?
Suggested:
1. [Infer from directory name]
2. [Infer from package.json/go.mod if brownfield]
3. Type your ownQ2: Project Description
Describe your project in one sentence.
Suggested:
1. A web application that [does X]
2. A CLI tool for [doing Y]
3. Type your ownQ3: Problem Statement
What problem does this project solve?
Suggested:
1. Users struggle to [pain point]
2. There's no good way to [need]
3. Type your ownQ4: Target Users
Who are the primary users?
Suggested:
1. Developers building [X]
2. End users who need [Y]
3. Internal teams managing [Z]
4. Type your ownQ5: Key Goals (optional)
What are 2-3 key goals for this project? (Press enter to skip)Q1: Voice and Tone
What voice/tone should documentation and UI text use?
Suggested:
1. Professional and technical
2. Friendly and approachable
3. Concise and direct
4. Type your ownQ2: Design Principles
What design principles guide this project?
Suggested:
1. Simplicity over features
2. Performance first
3. Developer experience focused
4. User safety and reliability
5. Type your own (comma-separated)For brownfield projects, first analyze existing code:
Glob to find package.json, requirements.txt, go.mod, Cargo.toml, etc.Q1: Primary Language(s)
What primary language(s) does this project use?
[For brownfield: "I detected: Python 3.11, JavaScript. Is this correct?"]
Suggested:
1. TypeScript
2. Python
3. Go
4. Rust
5. Type your own (comma-separated)Q2: Frontend Framework (if applicable)
What frontend framework (if any)?
Suggested:
1. React
2. Vue
3. Next.js
4. None / CLI only
5. Type your ownQ3: Backend Framework (if applicable)
What backend framework (if any)?
Suggested:
1. Express / Fastify
2. Django / FastAPI
3. Go standard library
4. None / Frontend only
5. Type your ownQ4: Database (if applicable)
What database (if any)?
Suggested:
1. PostgreSQL
2. MongoDB
3. SQLite
4. None / Stateless
5. Type your ownQ5: Infrastructure
Where will this be deployed?
Suggested:
1. AWS (Lambda, ECS, etc.)
2. Vercel / Netlify
3. Self-hosted / Docker
4. Not decided yet
5. Type your ownQ1: TDD Strictness
How strictly should TDD be enforced?
Suggested:
1. Strict - tests required before implementation
2. Moderate - tests encouraged, not blocked
3. Flexible - tests recommended for complex logicQ2: Commit Strategy
What commit strategy should be followed?
Suggested:
1. Conventional Commits (feat:, fix:, etc.)
2. Descriptive messages, no format required
3. Squash commits per taskQ3: Code Review Requirements
What code review policy?
Suggested:
1. Required for all changes
2. Required for non-trivial changes
3. Optional / self-review OKQ4: Verification Checkpoints
When should manual verification be required?
Suggested:
1. After each phase completion
2. After each task completion
3. Only at track completionQ1: Languages to Include
Which language style guides should be generated?
[Based on detected languages, pre-select]
Options:
1. TypeScript/JavaScript
2. Python
3. Go
4. Rust
5. All detected languages
6. Skip style guidesQ2: Existing Conventions
Do you have existing linting/formatting configs to incorporate?
[For brownfield: "I found .eslintrc, .prettierrc. Should I incorporate these?"]
Suggested:
1. Yes, use existing configs
2. No, generate fresh guides
3. Skip this stepAfter completing Q&A, generate the following files:
# Conductor - [Project Name]
Navigation hub for project context.
## Quick Links
- [Product Definition](./product.md)
- [Product Guidelines](./product-guidelines.md)
- [Tech Stack](./tech-stack.md)
- [Workflow](./workflow.md)
- [Tracks](./tracks.md)
## Active Tracks
<!-- Auto-populated by /conductor:new-track -->
## Getting Started
Run `/conductor:new-track` to create your first feature track.Template populated with Q&A answers for:
Template populated with:
Template populated with:
Template populated with:
# Tracks Registry
| Status | Track ID | Title | Created | Updated |
| ------ | -------- | ----- | ------- | ------- |
<!-- Tracks registered by /conductor:new-track -->Generate selected style guides from $CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/templates/code_styleguides/
After each successful file creation:
setup_state.json:
files_created arraylast_updated timestampcompleted_sectionsRead toolWhen all files are created:
Set setup_state.json status to "complete"
Display summary:
Conductor setup complete!
Created artifacts:
- conductor/index.md
- conductor/product.md
- conductor/product-guidelines.md
- conductor/tech-stack.md
- conductor/workflow.md
- conductor/tracks.md
- conductor/code_styleguides/[languages]
Next steps:
1. Review generated files and customize as needed
2. Run /conductor:new-track to create your first trackIf --resume argument or resuming from state:
setup_state.jsoncurrent_section and current_question