Content
50%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, reasonably lean set of concrete architecture rules, but it lacks worked examples, repeats some rules across sections, and offers a circular 'When to Use' rather than a clear workflow.
Suggestions
Add at least one before/after worked example for naming (e.g., `utils.js` -> `OrderCalculator`) and for separation of concerns to make guidance concrete.
De-duplicate rules that appear in both 'Best Practices' and 'Anti-Patterns' (file-length limits, UI/business-logic mixing) to improve token efficiency.
Rewrite 'When to Use' with concrete triggers (e.g., 'Use when designing module boundaries or planning domain structure') instead of the circular current phrasing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean with no concept-explaining fluff, but rules are restated across sections (e.g., file-length limits and business-logic-in-UI warnings appear in both Best Practices and Anti-Patterns) and could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Offers concrete thresholds and named tools ('cockatiel', max 3 levels nesting, <50 line functions), but provides no worked examples and interleaves abstract DDD principles, leaving guidance incomplete rather than fully actionable. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Sections are well organized, but the 'When to Use' clause is circular ('applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview') and no sequenced process or checkpoints are given. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file with clear section headers and no nested references, but it is ~78 lines of inline rules rather than a lean overview pointing to detail; the under-50-line simple-skill exception does not strictly apply. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |