Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and cleanly organized for a simple instruction skill, with the only weakness being a few justifying sentences that pad the otherwise tight rules.
Suggestions
Trim explanatory tail clauses like "Monotonous rhythm sounds robotic." and "They add nothing." so each rule is just the directive plus its concrete example.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean with concrete examples, but several trailing justifications ("Monotonous rhythm sounds robotic", "Formal writing avoids them. Human writing doesn't.", "They add nothing.") explain what Claude already knows and could be trimmed, so it lands at 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' rather than 'every token earns its place'. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives copy-paste-ready specifics: exact phrases to avoid ("I'd be happy to help", "Certainly!"), concrete word swaps ("Use" not "utilise"), and a contrastive example ("Sales dropped 15% in March" vs. vague alternative), fully matching the 'specific examples; copy-paste ready' anchor for an instruction-only skill. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple single-purpose style skill with no multi-step or destructive process; the rules are clearly categorized into Voice, Structure, Word Choice, and limits, which per the simple-skills note warrants a 3. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is under 50 lines, has no external references, and is organized into well-labeled sections, which per the guidelines lets progressive disclosure score 3 on well-organized sections alone. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |