CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

minutes-lint

Health-check your meeting knowledge for contradictions, stale commitments, and decision conflicts. Use when the user asks "any conflicts in my meetings", "check for stale action items", "lint my meetings", "consistency check", "are there contradictions", or wants to audit their decision history.

72

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

The canonical home for this skill is minutes-lint in silverstein/minutes

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

An efficient, highly actionable skill body with concrete commands, exact output templates, and well-organized sections. The sole gap is a missing explicit validation/check step between parsing the JSON output and presenting the report.

Suggestions

Add an explicit checkpoint after parsing JSON (e.g. verify the expected fields are present and handle a malformed/empty payload before formatting) to close the workflow-clarity gap.

Note that the '--stale-after-days' default is stated as 7 in the filter list but the example command uses 14; pick one consistent default to avoid confusing the agent.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The ~72-line body is lean and assumes Claude's competence; every section (run, format, next steps, gotchas) earns its place with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows.

5 / 5

Actionability

Provides a copy-paste-ready command with flags, instructs JSON parsing, and gives exact report templates with placeholders covering conflicts, stale items, and the clean case.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The run -> parse -> format -> suggest sequence is clear with failure handling in Gotchas (nonzero exit treated as unavailable), but there is no explicit validation checkpoint after parsing the JSON before presenting results.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A self-contained skill with no bundle files and no nested references, organized into clearly headed sections (How to run, Formatting, When to suggest, Gotchas) that are easy to navigate.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, concrete description with explicit trigger guidance that clearly conveys both purpose and invocation. The only notable weakness is the second-person 'your meeting knowledge' voice, which the rubric penalizes on specificity.

Suggestions

Rewrite in third person to avoid the specificity penalty: e.g. 'Health-checks meeting knowledge...' instead of 'Health-check your meeting knowledge'.

Consider adding a couple more natural synonyms (e.g. 'audit my decisions', 'find forgotten action items') to push trigger term coverage toward the top anchor.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the meeting-consistency domain and three concrete findings (contradictions, stale commitments, decision conflicts), but the second-person 'your meeting knowledge' phrasing triggers the voice penalty, lowering the otherwise-4 to 3.

3 / 5

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (health-check meeting knowledge for contradictions, stale commitments, decision conflicts) and 'when' with explicit, concrete trigger phrases, matching the top anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The 'Use when' clause lists several natural phrases users would actually say ('any conflicts in my meetings', 'lint my meetings', 'consistency check', 'are there contradictions'), but a few common synonyms/variations are absent and no file extensions apply.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (meeting consistency linting) with distinct, specific triggers and minimal overlap risk against other skills.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
silverstein/minutes
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.