CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

minutes-live-sidekick

Act as the user's live meeting sidekick inside the current terminal agent session. Use when the user explicitly asks you, the terminal agent, to watch a meeting, follow the live transcript, answer during the call, offer strategist thoughts, silently watch for risks, or track decisions. Do not use this skill to start or control the separate Minutes Coach HUD; explicit Coach or HUD lifecycle requests belong to minutes-copilot, and an ambiguous request such as "coach me live" requires one short surface clarification.

66

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, instruction-only skill body with concrete commands, explicit guardrails, and disciplined token use throughout. It scores uniformly strong with only minor gaps: undefined cursor semantics, no fallback for unexpected status states, and borderline length for a fully inline SKILL.md.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and operational ("finals are settled transcript evidence", "A directly typed user message outranks monitoring and background analysis") with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, though the surface-selection section repeats the frontmatter and a few never-list items overlap, keeping it just short of fully lean.

4 / 5

Actionability

It provides executable commands (`minutes transcript --status`, `minutes transcript --since 2m --include-current`, `minutes stop`, `minutes status`) plus an exact clarification question and four named postures, but the `<cursor>` placeholder is never defined and "documented exact-session event or wait adapter" leaves discovery unspecified, so minor gaps remain.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Sections form a clear sequence (select surface, establish contract, attach, respect priority, handle evidence, end and hand off) with explicit checkpoints such as gating `minutes stop` on a directly typed user request and waiting for finalization before debrief; the gap is that no guidance covers status showing neither `Live` nor `Start Recording`.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is self-contained with clear section headers and only one-level, clearly signaled references to sibling skills (`/minutes-copilot`, `/minutes-debrief`), but at roughly 97 lines it exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill case and dense sections like evidence handling could arguably be split into reference files.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description with explicit what/when trigger guidance and excellent disambiguation from the sibling minutes-copilot skill. Its only weaknesses are second-person voice ("asks you, the terminal agent"), which costs specificity under the rubric, and slightly abstract action phrasing.

Suggestions

Rewrite in third person to remove the second-person reference, e.g. "Use when the user explicitly asks the terminal agent to watch a meeting..." instead of "asks you, the terminal agent".

Add one or two more concrete operational actions to raise specificity, e.g. "run bounded minutes transcript reads" or "report recording and processing state after the meeting stops".

Broaden trigger coverage with common user phrasings such as "take notes during the meeting" or "listen in on the call".

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description lists several concrete actions ("watch a meeting, follow the live transcript, answer during the call, offer strategist thoughts, silently watch for risks, or track decisions"), which matches the anchor for several specific actions with minor gaps (base 4), but the second-person phrasing "the user explicitly asks you, the terminal agent" triggers the rubric's voice penalty, reducing specificity by 1.

3 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both what ("Act as the user's live meeting sidekick inside the current terminal agent session") and when ("Use when the user explicitly asks you... to watch a meeting, follow the live transcript...") with concrete trigger phrases, plus an explicit when-not clause, matching the top anchor exactly.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user phrases are present ("watch a meeting", "follow the live transcript", "answer during the call", "track decisions", plus the ambiguous "coach me live" case), giving good keyword coverage, though common variations like "take notes during the meeting" or "listen in" are missing, so it falls short of the comprehensive-synonym anchor.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The description carves out a clear niche and explicitly routes conflicting requests elsewhere ("explicit Coach or HUD lifecycle requests belong to minutes-copilot"), even handling the ambiguous "coach me live" trigger, so conflict risk is minimal rather than merely minor.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
silverstein/minutes
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.