CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

crest

Building engineer self-branding by turning technical contributions into a professional brand. Use for GitHub/LinkedIn/blog/conference positioning or content strategy.

62

Quality

73%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.archive/crest/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A thorough, well-structured instruction skill with a clear workflow, concrete frameworks, and good reference navigation. Its chief weakness is conciseness: time-sensitive platform statistics and a redundant capabilities block are inlined in SKILL.md rather than pushed into the reference files it already points to.

Suggestions

Move the inline LinkedIn engagement statistics and source citations out of the Core Contract bullet into reference/metrics-guide.md or reference/amplification-playbook.md, leaving only the operative rule (e.g. 'keep 80%+ within Topic DNA pillars; saves/comments outweigh likes') in SKILL.md.

Remove or shrink the top HTML CAPABILITIES/COLLABORATION comment block, which duplicates the Trigger Guidance, Recipes, and Collaboration sections already in the body.

Make the workflow's verification loop explicit (e.g. AP audit fails -> revise -> re-audit before delivery) so the validation checkpoint reads as a feedback loop rather than a single deliverable checklist item.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly well-organized with terse tables and principles, but the Core Contract bullet is a large inline dump of time-sensitive LinkedIn statistics (e.g. '~6.6% baseline', '5.72% B2B median', '14% YoY') with cited sources that the Reference Map indicates belongs in metrics-guide.md/amplification-playbook.md, and the top HTML CAPABILITIES comment duplicates body content.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete, specific guidance for an instruction-only skill: named frameworks (Tech x Domain x Perspective), exact rules (pin 4-6 repos, <=275-char About, 80% pillar rule), a recipes/subcommand table, and an anti-pattern table with detection and fix columns; minor gaps keep it below fully copy-paste-ready.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The DISCOVER -> POSITION -> CRAFT -> AMPLIFY -> MEASURE workflow is clearly sequenced with per-phase actions and key rules, plus subcommand dispatch, output routing, and verification baked into deliverables (AP audit, consistency check); recovery/error loops are not fully explicit, so not a 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A Reference Map table and a 'Read First' column give well-signaled one-level-deep navigation to reference/*.md and _common/*.md files; however no bundle files are present in the review and some inlined statistics should live in those references, leaving minor organization gaps.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that clearly states what the skill does and when to use it with concrete platform triggers. Its main limitation is moderate specificity (one core action) and minor overlap risk via the broad 'content strategy' phrase.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('engineer self-branding') and one concrete action ('turning technical contributions into a professional brand'), matching the domain + 1-2 concrete actions anchor; not comprehensive enough for a 4.

3 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Building engineer self-branding by turning technical contributions into a professional brand') and when ('Use for GitHub/LinkedIn/blog/conference positioning or content strategy') with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural platform terms users would say ('GitHub/LinkedIn/blog/conference positioning', 'content strategy'); missing synonyms like 'personal branding' or 'professional brand' as triggers, so not a 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Engineer self-branding' is a clear niche with distinct triggers, but the broad 'content strategy' term carries minor overlap risk with general content skills, keeping it below a 5.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
simota/agent-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.