Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a high-quality, executable workflow skill with concrete commands, explicit validation, and well-structured sections. The only real weakness is heavy cross-referencing of `/ship`'s step internals rather than self-contained sync guidance, plus minor redundancy in the push-sync warnings.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and operational, assuming Claude's competence (no explanations of PRs, GraphQL, or merge conflicts), but the sync-check guidance repeats across steps 6, 7, and the hard rules, leaving minor redundancy. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready `gh` and GraphQL commands with exact trigger strings ('@greptile', '@cubic-dev-ai review this PR') cover the common cases including conflicts, stale rounds, and false positives. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 10-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (state check in step 1, sync check in step 6, post-push verify in step 7) and a fix → reply → resolve → re-review feedback loop with explicit stop conditions. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized with no bundle files to split out, but the skill leans heavily on `/ship`'s internal step numbers ('re-run the full sync check from `/ship` step 2'), which a reader must navigate externally — a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |