Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable release workflow with concrete commands and an explicit verification step. Its main gap is the absence of an explicit failure-recovery loop in the verification step for a destructive operation.
Suggestions
Add an explicit 'if verification fails, fix the missing files/tag and re-run the bump' feedback loop to satisfy the destructive-operation validation requirement.
Show the exact command for writing the marketing file (e.g., a heredoc into $marketing_file) so the draft step is fully copy-paste-ready.
Trim editorial lines like the v0.2.0 style reference and the standalone-sync-script note to tighten conciseness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no padding over concepts Claude already knows and tight imperative sections, but a few lines ('Target style: similar to the v0.2.0 narrative', 'Do not use a standalone changelog sync script') are slightly editorial and could be trimmed, fitting anchor 4 rather than the pristine 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready commands (cargo bump with explicit level forms, SPACEBOT_RELEASE_MARKETING_COPY_FILE env var, mktemp, gh auth status, git show/tag verification), but only narrates 'write markdown content to $marketing_file' without an explicit write command, a minor gap keeping it at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence with an explicit verify step and checklist (Cargo.toml/Cargo.lock/CHANGELOG.md plus tag confirmation) for a destructive release operation, but it lacks an explicit validate->fix->retry recovery loop when verification fails, so it fits anchor 4 rather than the 5 with feedback loops. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the ~52-line single-file body is cleanly organized into well-labeled sections (Goal, Workflow, Requirements, Release Story Format, Notes) with no nested references, meeting the simple-skill exception for a 5 on well-organized structure with no external references needed. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |