Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, high-quality internal skill: it is almost entirely non-obvious repository knowledge, gives copy-paste-ready commands and code, and sequences diagnosis through validated intervention. Minor room remains in trimming a few dense passages and moving reference-grade detail (pipeline order, debug tooling) into bundle files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Nearly every sentence carries implementation-specific knowledge (verbose event caveats, sweep ordering semantics, pack/bundle workflow) with no padding or generic explanations, but a few dense passages such as the matching-order paragraph and verbose-option semantics could be trimmed or tightened, so it is not fully lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: runnable ESM snippets for verbose tracing and event capture, exact pnpm commands with flag semantics (debug:word --in/--json, debug:hooks, debug:rules --sort miss-ms), concrete file paths, rule syntax examples like '_ #Det -> #Inf', and defined compact fields (m, g, t, r, n, u). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The body sequences the work clearly (establish the failure → understand the pipeline → choose the intervention → debug stage boundaries → validate scope and cost) with explicit validation checkpoints: contrasting readings, baseline comparison, pnpm test/lint, before/after benching, and reporting checks that could not run. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist; the single body is well-organized into clear sections with consistently signaled, one-level-deep relative links into the target repository, but at ~290 lines fully inline, material such as pipeline-order details and debug-tooling semantics could be split into reference files to lighten SKILL.md. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |