Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary lean overview: terse, well-structured, with clear one-level-deep references and verification-aware completion guidance. The only limitation is that executable commands and detailed validation loops are delegated to the reference files rather than appearing inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and dense with operational rules, assumes Claude's competence, and contains no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows — every line earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It points to concrete, named files and artifacts (notes.md, publishing.md, src/embedded_web_data.h, stable) with specific conditions for loading each; the executable commands live in the references, so for an instruction-only overview this is mostly executable guidance with minor gaps rather than fully copy-paste ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | There is a clear Select-work → Invariants → Completion sequence, and the Completion section includes verification checkpoints (report actual CI status, "publication does not prove all artifacts are ready", report concrete blockers), so it is not subject to the destructive-operation cap; the detailed validate-fix-retry loops themselves live in the references, leaving minor validation gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with two well-signaled, one-level-deep references (notes.md for drafting, publishing.md for publication), both real files, with clear load conditions — content is appropriately split and easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |