Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is actionable and mostly concise with a real executable script and good examples, but the workflow lacks an explicit validation checkpoint and references two paths (templates/markdown-template.md, sandbox/) that are absent from the bundle.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation checkpoint between Step 1 and Step 2, e.g. 'Check the JSON success field; if false, surface the error to the user before formatting.'
Either include templates/markdown-template.md in the bundle or inline the formatting instructions in SKILL.md so Step 2 is not a dead-end reference.
Clarify that sandbox/ should be created if absent, or move report output to a path the skill guarantees exists.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely efficient with executable commands, args, and copy-paste examples; minor redundancy from restating flags in both the usage line and the Arguments section, and the dense strike-band formula is justified domain detail Claude lacks. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete, runnable command with real ticker examples and documents JSON output fields, but Step 2 references a 'templates/markdown-template.md' file that is not present in the bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Three steps are sequenced (Gather, Format, Report) and port-fallback retry is a feedback loop, but there is no explicit checkpoint to verify the script's 'success' field or data validity before formatting the report. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized and scripts/roll.py is a valid one-level-deep reference, but Step 2 points to a missing 'templates/markdown-template.md' and a missing 'sandbox/' directory, creating navigation dead-ends. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |