Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-sequenced, actionable workflow with genuinely executable commands, undermined by a dangling reference to a missing template file and by a redundant Example/Report Contents pair that duplicates content available elsewhere. Tightening the duplication and shipping (or removing references to) the template would lift it substantially.
Suggestions
Ship templates/markdown-template.md in the bundle or replace both references to it with the inline section list — currently the instruction 'Read templates/markdown-template.md for formatting instructions' points at a nonexistent file.
Delete the redundant Example section (it repeats Step 1's command verbatim) and merge the JSON-fields list with the Report Contents list, which enumerate the same sections twice.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint after Step 1: if the script's JSON contains an 'error' key (or exits nonzero), surface it to the user instead of generating a report.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient — numbered steps, terse command blocks, a compact JSON-fields list — but the Example section repeats Step 1's exact command verbatim and the 11-item 'Report Contents' section re-enumerates both the JSON output keys above it and the contents of templates/markdown-template.md. More than minor trimming is needed, so anchor 3 rather than 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Commands are concrete and executable ('uv run python scripts/report.py SYMBOL'), the output filename convention and JSON schema are fully specified, and the optional PDF step has a real invocation path. Not anchor 5 because the markdown-to-pdf invocation assumes an external skill path that is not verified, and the referenced template file is missing from the bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear three-step sequence (gather data → write markdown → optionally convert to PDF → report results), with the PDF step explicitly gated on user request and multi-symbol handling specified. Missing a checkpoint to inspect the script's error JSON before proceeding keeps it below anchor 5; it is not capped at 3 since this is neither destructive nor a batch operation. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sectioning is good and the bundle contains scripts/report.py, but templates/markdown-template.md is referenced twice and does not exist in the bundle (no templates/ or references/ directory), and the inlined 'Report Contents' list duplicates content that belongs in that template. Dangling reference plus inlined duplicate content fit anchor 3 rather than the well-organized anchor 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |