Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and workflow-clear, with executable Codex commands, explicit gates, and verification checklists, but it is dense and monolithic — prose rationale and long-run details could be trimmed or offloaded to keep the core overview lean.
Suggestions
Trim or move the economics rationale and minification-incident lore into a short 'Rationale' reference file so the main flow stays lean.
Split the Liveness watchdog and Prompt Contract sections into one-level-deep reference files (e.g., WATCHDOG.md, PROMPT-CONTRACT.md) signaled from the overview to improve progressive disclosure.
Tighten prose-heavy bullets (e.g., the harness-visibility paragraph) into imperative directives without losing the operational signal.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly high-signal operational guidance, but includes explanatory padding — the economics rationale ('Claude tokens metered + expensive; Codex flat-rate') and the minification-incident anecdote — that could be tightened; not the lean level-3 ideal. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands with pinned flags and model ('command codex exec --yolo -C <repo> -m gpt-5.6-sol ...'), plus the resume, watchdog, and launcher install scripts — concrete rather than pseudocode. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequences with explicit validation gates ('rebase→resolve→push→CI attach+green→land'), feedback loops ('after 2 failed rounds, take over'), and a coordinator verification checklist for landed PRs. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into labeled sections, but it is a monolithic 200+ line single file with no reference offloading; the watchdog and prompt-contract details could be split into one-level-deep reference files. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |