Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean, well-structured, and highly actionable with concrete commands and clear guardrails, but the outward-facing send workflow lacks an explicit validation/feedback loop and the publish/force-send syntax is not shown.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation step before posting (e.g. confirm the resolved target and re-check delivery mode, with a retry on failure) to lift workflow clarity.
Show the command syntax for 'publish' and 'force-send' so the full action set is copy-paste ready.
Clarify the order of preference between ask, publish, and force-send as a short numbered sequence.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient — no explanations of what Discord or OpenClaw are, just headers, commands, and guardrails, with every token earning its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste bash commands with real flags for targets/resolve/ask, but the publish and force-send verbs are only named without showing their command syntax. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A rough sequence is present (resolve, prefer private ask, publish/force-send) and 'Resolve the target before sending' is a checkpoint, but the outward-facing send lacks an explicit validate-then-retry feedback loop, capping this at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, no external bundle needed, and cleanly organized into Transport and Guardrails sections — meeting the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |