Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured relay skill: executable commands, a clear ordered workflow with a resolve-first checkpoint, and useful guardrails, with no filler or assumed-knowledge padding. The only minor gap is that the publish and force-send modes are named without showing their full command syntax.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — executable commands, brief usage notes, and guardrails with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching 'Lean and efficient; every token earns its place.' | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Primary commands are fully executable and copy-paste ready ('python3 .../openclaw_relay.py ask --target maintainers --message ...'), matching the score-3 anchor; the named publish/force-send modes lack full syntax but the core examples are concrete and complete. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear ordered flow (resolve → prefer private ask → publish/force-send) is given with an explicit checkpoint ('Resolve the target before sending real content'), and since this is a non-destructive single-route skill the simple-skill scoring note allows a 3. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | At ~30 lines with no bundle files and no nested references, the well-organized Transport and Guardrails sections satisfy the under-50-lines note that progressive disclosure can score 3 with clear organization alone. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |