CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

oracle

Oracle second-model review: bundle prompts/files, debug, refactor, design.

60

Quality

70%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

High

Do not use without reviewing

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/oracle/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, highly actionable CLI reference with concrete commands, a sequenced golden path, and clear error-recovery guidance. Its main limitation is the absence of progressive disclosure into separate reference files and a few sections that could be slightly tighter.

Suggestions

Split the dense "API preflight" and "Prompt template" sections into separate reference files linked from the overview to improve progressive disclosure.

Add an explicit validation checklist before API/browser runs (e.g., confirm consent, check `oracle doctor` output, verify file set via `--dry-run`) to strengthen workflow checkpoints.

Tighten the "Exhaustive prompt" pattern subsection, which partially restates guidance already covered in the Prompt template list.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and assumes Claude's competence (e.g., "Oracle starts with **zero** project knowledge"), with only minor sections like the "Exhaustive prompt" pattern that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready commands throughout (e.g., `npx -y @steipete/oracle --engine browser --model gpt-5.5-pro -p "<task>" --file "src/**"`) covering the common browser, API, dry-run, and reattach cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A numbered "Golden path" sequences the work with a preview checkpoint (`--dry-run` + `--files-report`) and a reattach feedback loop for detached runs, though some validation guidance is implicit rather than an explicit checklist.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into clearly signaled sections (Commands, Attaching files, Engines, API preflight, Sessions); no external reference files exist, and dense subsections like API preflight are inlined but appropriately placed with minor organization gaps.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

58%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise and names concrete actions plus a distinct tool, but it omits any explicit "when to use" trigger phrasing and leans on jargon ("second-model review") that users may not naturally say.

Suggestions

Add an explicit "Use when…" clause naming natural triggers (e.g., "Use when you want a second model to review code, debug, refactor, or design with full repo context").

Replace or supplement "second-model review" with user-natural phrasing like "get a second opinion from another model" to improve trigger term quality.

Mention the bundled-context mechanism in user terms (e.g., "bundles your prompt with selected files") so the core capability is unambiguous.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions ("bundle prompts/files, debug, refactor, design") but stops short of comprehensive coverage of Oracle's capabilities.

4 / 5

Completeness

The "what" is clear (Oracle second-model review with bundled context), but there is no "Use when…" clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"debug", "refactor", and "design" are natural user terms, but "Oracle second-model review" is jargon and common synonyms like "code review" or "second opinion" are missing.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Oracle" names a distinct niche tool, though the trailing "debug, refactor, design" verbs create minor overlap risk with generic coding skills.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
steipete/agent-scripts
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.