Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, opinionated, and actionable guide with concrete Swift examples for every guideline and a clearly sequenced workflow. Its main gaps are minor: one truncated code example, no explicit post-refactor verification step, and some inline example bulk that could be moved to the existing reference file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is bullet-driven with no padding and no explanations of concepts Claude already knows; each of the three Swift examples earns its place, though the "header/filters" example is a truncated fragment that could be trimmed to one representative section. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete executable Swift snippets (the init(dependency:) pattern, HeaderSection extraction, subview split) cover the common cases, and the ordering rules are precise; one example is cut off mid-structure (the filters snippet), keeping it just below fully copy-paste ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-step workflow is clearly sequenced with a confirmation checkpoint ("Confirm Observation usage") and a behavior-preservation guardrail ("do not change layout or business logic unless requested"); an explicit post-refactor verification step (e.g., re-checking behavior is intact) is the minor missing checkpoint. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized and the single reference (references/mv-patterns.md, which exists) is one level deep and clearly signaled; however, the three lengthy inline code examples and the two split-section guidelines could partly live in that reference, leaving minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |