Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, highly actionable skill body with a clearly sequenced five-phase workflow and explicit validation gates. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: a methodology reference exists but is neither linked from the body nor differentiated from the inline content.
Suggestions
Either link references/methodology.md from the body (e.g., a 'See methodology.md for a short reference' note) or remove it if the inline content already suffices, to avoid an unreferenced, duplicative file.
If keeping methodology.md, move the detailed conventions (e.g., journal format, state.yaml schema, 3-failure escalation detail) there and keep SKILL.md as the overview, so the two files are clearly one level deep rather than overlapping.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean throughout — terse bullet rules, inline commands, and tables with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready shell commands for each script (init-session.sh, failure-tracker.sh, reboot-test.sh, archive-session.sh) and a precise 0/1/2 scoring spec, rather than vague direction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Five phases are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (>=9 spec gate to enter Plan, TDD rule, 3-failure protocol with exit-code 3, max 3 fix rounds, 3-question reboot test), giving strong feedback loops for the destructive/risky operations it governs. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-sectioned and a references/methodology.md bundle exists, but the body never signals or links to it, and methodology.md largely duplicates inline content, so structure is present but references are not clearly navigated. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |