Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, mostly executable workflow with clean section organization appropriate to a small single-purpose skill. The main gap is validation: nothing verifies the build succeeded before launching the UI, and the port-kill and review-creation steps stop short of concrete commands.
Suggestions
Add a validation checkpoint after `yarn build storybook <extra packages>` — e.g., check the command's exit status or build output for errors, and only start `yarn storybook:ui` when the build passes (fix and re-run on failure).
Make the occupied-port handling concrete: show how to identify the process on the Storybook port (e.g., `lsof -i :6006` or equivalent) and kill it, rather than just directing to "kill the old process".
Specify the `review-create` MCP tool invocation (its exact parameters or a minimal example call) so the review step in Step 5 is executable rather than descriptive.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and imperative throughout — "Build a space-separated list", "Run these in the code directory, in order", "rm -rf node_modules/.cache" — with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides executable commands ("yarn build storybook <extra packages>", "NODE_OPTIONS=\"--preserve-symlinks\" yarn storybook:ui") plus a worked example of package-name derivation ("addon-review addon-vitest"), but "kill the old process to free the port" and "use Storybook's review-create MCP tool" give direction without the specific commands. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five-step sequence is clearly ordered and includes one recovery loop ("If the port is occupied, cancel the start, kill the old process... then start Storybook again"), but there is no validation that the build succeeded before starting the UI; the destructive `rm -rf node_modules/.cache` step and multi-package batch build without validation cap this at 3 per the rubric. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with well-organized numbered sections ("Step 1" through "Step 5" plus a focused "Handle an occupied port" subsection) and needs no external references; per the rubric's simple-skill guideline this warrants a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |