Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-crafted, dense skill body: precise measurement boundaries, concrete implementation details, explicit validation and cleanup steps, and genuinely useful domain knowledge (warm vs cold runs, iframe.html pitfall, server/browser/total attribution). Its weaknesses are moderate redundancy across three overlapping step restatements and the absence of a complete executable script plus hang/timeout error handling.
Suggestions
Consolidate the overlapping step sequences in 'Quick Start', 'Measurement Rules', and 'Harness behavior' into one canonical numbered sequence, keeping the other sections for defaults and rationale only — this removes ~20 lines of repetition.
Add explicit error-recovery guidance for the harness hanging (e.g., timeout on the preview-side signal with a diagnostic message) to complete the feedback loop alongside the existing stale-server check.
Consider moving the full summary-stats JSON block and detailed harness spec into a one-level-deep reference file (e.g., references/summary-format.md) to keep SKILL.md as a tighter overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Sections are lean, imperative, and free of concept-explanation padding, but the Quick Start steps, 'Measurement Rules', and 'Harness behavior' restate the same spawn→wait→launch→signal→print sequence three times, which could be tightened. Fits 4 (efficient with minor trimmable overlap) rather than 5 (every token earns its place). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete flags, APIs, and schemas are given (`storybook dev --no-open`, `requestAnimationFrame()`, `window.__sbStartupBenchmark`, `performance.mark('sb:first-story-rendered')`, explicit JSON payload and summary formats), but no complete executable harness script is provided — a gap partly justified by the 'reuse an existing benchmark script if possible' instruction, which places it at 4 rather than 5 or 3. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 8-step harness sequence includes explicit validation (fail fast if the port is in use), cleanup (kill the full process group), and a feedback loop (unrealistically low `server.average` → check for a stale server), plus a pitfalls checklist. It falls short of 5 only because there is no timeout or no-signal-received error handling for a harness that could hang waiting on the preview-side signal. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single body file is well-organized with clear headers and appropriately self-contained guidance, but at ~157 lines the detailed harness spec and full summary JSON block could be offloaded to a one-level-deep reference file, which matches the 4 anchor (good structure, minor organization gaps) rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |