Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured instruction-only skill: every step is tied to a concrete gh command, the workflow includes an early-exit checkpoint and an iterative user-confirmation loop before the destructive edit, and the Notes section captures non-obvious repository conventions. Nothing wasted, nothing missing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every line is actionable or carries non-obvious judgment guidance ("Only flag *meaningful* divergence... Ignore trivial wording", "Do not remove the canary release section"). No concept re-explanation or padding exists, matching the lean anchor-5 example. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Each step includes an exact, executable command — "gh pr view", "gh pr view <pr> --json title,body", "gh pr diff <pr>", "gh pr edit <pr> --title ... --body ..." — plus concrete criteria for what counts as divergence. Per the rubric's instruction-only guidance note, this actionable specificity merits the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six numbered steps in a clear sequence with explicit checkpoints: step 4's early exit ("If not, stop here"), step 5's one-change-at-a-time user confirmation loop, and step 6 gated on agreement before the mutating edit. Not 4 because no validation checkpoint is missing for the write operation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no need for external references, and content is organized into well-signaled sections (Workflow, Notes). The rubric's simple-skill guideline awards 5 in exactly this case. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |