CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

code-review

Conduct thorough, constructive code reviews for quality and security. Use when reviewing pull requests, checking code quality, identifying bugs, or auditing security. Handles best practices, SOLID principles, security vulnerabilities, performance analysis, and testing coverage.

91

1.03x
Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

98%

1.03x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Evaluation results

96%

Code Review: User Authentication and Profile Module

Security vulnerability detection

Criteria
Without context
With context

SQL injection in login

100%

100%

SQL injection in profile

100%

100%

XSS via innerHTML

100%

100%

Hardcoded secret key

100%

100%

Hardcoded admin token

100%

100%

Insecure direct object reference

100%

100%

Passwords stored in plaintext

100%

100%

Outdated/vulnerable dependencies

100%

100%

Severity prioritization

100%

100%

Concrete fix suggestions

100%

100%

Positive acknowledgement

0%

0%

No debug mode in production

100%

100%

99%

1%

Code Review: Order Processing Module

Code quality anti-patterns and naming

Criteria
Without context
With context

God class identification

100%

100%

Deep nesting / early returns

100%

100%

Magic numbers flagged

100%

100%

Dead code removal

100%

100%

DRY / code duplication

100%

100%

Poor naming conventions

100%

100%

Silent exception suppression

100%

100%

Function length / single responsibility

75%

87%

Resource management

100%

100%

Severity classification

100%

100%

Positive feedback included

100%

100%

100%

9%

Code Review: Data Export Feature with Tests

Testing standards and structured feedback

Criteria
Without context
With context

Test naming critique

100%

100%

Descriptive test name example

100%

100%

Missing docstring on parse_date

75%

100%

Missing or incomplete docstring on export_events_to_csv

100%

100%

Missing error case tests

100%

100%

Test class naming

100%

100%

Specific line references

80%

100%

Issue prioritization

100%

100%

Constructive feedback with suggestions

100%

100%

Positive acknowledgement

75%

100%

Comment quality note

50%

100%

Repository
supercent-io/skills-template
Evaluated
Agent
Claude Code
Model
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.