Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable single-file skill with strong runnable examples and useful reference tables, but it is verbose in places and keeps all content inline rather than progressively disclosing detail via reference files.
Suggestions
Trim the matplotlib axis/label/legend boilerplate in the Kepler example to a minimal plot call, or move plotting into a short separate snippet, to tighten conciseness.
Add an explicit validate-fix-retry checkpoint pattern (e.g., check energy drift, adjust dt if above tolerance, re-run) and apply it consistently across the core workflows.
Split the integrator comparison table, troubleshooting table, and advanced examples (Yoshida, Poincare) into a reference file linked from a concise overview to improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient executable code, but the matplotlib plotting boilerplate in the Kepler example (~20 lines of axis/label setup) and the 'Why Symplectic Matters' rationale pad the body beyond what earns its place. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready implementations (leapfrog, Yoshida4, N-body figure-8, Poincare section) with concrete runnable examples and a comparison table. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Numbered core workflows give a clear sequence, but validation is shown only in example 1 (energy-conservation check); the other workflows lack explicit validate-fix-retry checkpoints. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized, but the ~250-line body is monolithic with all detail inline and no reference files to split out the comparison table, troubleshooting, or advanced examples. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |