CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

tinker-training-cost

Calculates training costs for Tinker fine-tuning jobs. Use when estimating costs for Tinker LLM training, counting tokens in datasets, or comparing Tinker model training prices. Tokenizes datasets using the correct model tokenizer and provides accurate cost estimates.

67

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable with executable commands, real pricing/tokenizer tables, and worked examples, and is well structured for navigation. The main gap is the absence of an explicit verification step in the batch tokenization/cost workflow.

Suggestions

Add a verification checkpoint to the workflow, e.g. a step to sanity-check the token count (run --list-models to confirm the model, or compare a small sample's token count against expectations) before trusting the final cost.

Move or clearly label the dated pricing table (Jan 5, 2026) so stale pricing is easy to spot and refresh, instead of embedding it inline as evergreen reference.

Trim a few explanatory asides (e.g. 'different tokenizers produce different token counts for the same text') that restate knowledge Claude already has.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean with executable commands and necessary reference tables, but contains a few explanatory asides Claude already knows and embeds time-sensitive dated pricing inline rather than in a deprecated section.

4 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands with real flags (--list-models, --model, --epochs, --json) plus worked cost examples and a present bundled script covering the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The load-tokenizer → count-tokens → calculate-cost sequence is clearly listed, but this batch dataset operation lacks an explicit validation/verification checkpoint, which caps workflow clarity at 3 per the batch-operation guidance.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized single-file overview with clear section headers and a single one-level-deep bundled script reference that exists on disk; no nested references, though some reference tables could arguably live in a separate file.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it states concrete capabilities, provides an explicit 'Use when' trigger clause, and is scoped to a distinctive niche. Minor gains are available by adding a broader action list and dataset file-extension triggers.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names concrete actions ('Calculates training costs', 'Tokenizes datasets using the correct model tokenizer and provides accurate cost estimates') but the list of distinct actions is modest rather than comprehensive, sitting between anchors 3 and 5.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (calculates/tokenizes/estimates) and 'when' via a concrete 'Use when ...' clause with multiple specific triggers.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural user phrases ('estimating costs for Tinker LLM training', 'counting tokens in datasets', 'comparing Tinker model training prices') but omits synonyms and dataset file extensions like .jsonl.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Targets the distinct Tinker fine-tuning niche with Tinker-specific triggers, giving it a clear niche and minimal conflict risk with unrelated skills.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
synthetic-sciences/openscience
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.