Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A clear, well-sequenced planning workflow with a strong validation feedback loop; main weaknesses are a referenced validation script that is absent from the bundle and mild duplication between the inline template and the plan-template reference.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced validation script (or correct its path) so the MANDATORY validate-plan.sh step is actually runnable, and consider moving it under scripts/ to match the bundle convention.
Replace the fully inlined plan structure template with a pointer to references/plan-template.md to reduce duplication and keep the body as an overview.
Trim redundancy between Critical Requirements, Boundaries, and When to Use so each rule appears once.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Sections are well-organized and mostly lean, but Critical Requirements and Boundaries restate guidance from When to Use/Planning Process, and 'describe in natural language, not code' is repeated, indicating minor over-explanation. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete file-naming convention, a full inline plan template, and a specific validation command make guidance mostly executable, but the mandated validation script path (./.forge/skills/create-plan/validate-plan.sh) is not present in the bundle, leaving the key step un-runnable as written. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 4-step Assess -> Create -> Validate -> Structure flow has a MANDATORY validation checkpoint with an explicit fix-and-re-validate feedback loop, matching the top anchor for sequenced validation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References/example-plan.md and references/plan-template.md are real and one level deep, but the body inlines a full plan template that largely duplicates plan-template.md, a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |