Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured with a clear sequenced workflow, real validation gate, and clean progressive disclosure to existing reference files. Weaknesses are placeholder-templated steps and a missing explicit validation-retry feedback loop.
Suggestions
Add an explicit error-recovery loop after the validation step (e.g., 'If validation fails: review errors, fix, and re-run validate_expert.sh until it passes before registering').
Replace or supplement the placeholder templates ({topic-1}.md, {name}) with a concrete worked example showing one fully-synthesized reference file.
Tighten the section intros (e.g., 'Automatically synthesizes references...' duplicates the frontmatter) to reduce remaining verbosity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient, using tables, directory trees, and tight step lists with no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows; a few lines could be trimmed further. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete commands (validate_expert.sh, register_expert.sh), a directory layout, and a YAML template, but several synthesis steps rely on placeholder templates ({topic-1}.md, {name}) rather than fully executable code. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence with an explicit validation gate ('If valid, register') exists, but the body lacks an explicit error-recovery loop (fix and re-validate) after validation failure. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep references ('→ See references/expert-structure.md / catalog-formats.md / signal-patterns.md'), all of which exist as real bundle files; navigation is easy. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |