Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A thorough, highly actionable skill body with concrete templates, exact paths, and well-sequenced workflows including idempotency and crash-recovery checkpoints; its main weaknesses are minor verbose prose and a long inlined context-engineering section that borders on monolithic.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and dense with concrete patterns, but the philosophical 'Spec-Driven Development & Your Role' paragraph and a few restated guidelines could be trimmed; it sits between 'mostly efficient with some unnecessary explanation' (3) and 'efficient; minor over-explanation' (4). | 3.5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready templates and exact commands — the completion protocol ('git add ... commit ... push ... touch sentinel'), the Slice Dependency Map table, the Signal section format, slice naming ('1.1-type-contracts.md'), and concrete BEFORE/AFTER and type-contract examples cover the common cases fully. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Invocation Contract gives a clearly ordered completion protocol plus explicit idempotency, crash-recovery, and ambiguous-PRD checkpoints with feedback loops, but the happy path lacks an explicit 'verify mainspec/slices are complete before committing' checkpoint between writing and the first push. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with clearly signaled, one-level-deep references to references/experts.md and references/signals.md (both present on disk), though the inlined six-pattern Context Engineering section is long and could partly live in a reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16.5 / 20 Passed |