Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized planning skill with excellent progressive disclosure (verified reference files and a clear load-when table) and a clear two-phase workflow. It is held below top marks by minor conciseness redundancy, execution detail delegated to references, and validation checkpoints that are implied rather than explicitly staged.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation checkpoint between RESEARCH and PLAN (e.g., a checklist the research output must satisfy before PLAN begins) to strengthen workflow_clarity.
Reduce the repeated "Load references/X.md for..." phrasing by relying on the reference table once it is introduced.
Inline one concrete rollback/validation snippet example so the per-domain plan format is unambiguous without loading a reference file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Efficient and assumes Claude's competence (no explanation of what migration or the Strangler Fig pattern is); the Core Principles and workflow diagram each earn their place. Minor redundancy in repeated "Load references/..." phrasing across the workflow and reference table keeps it just below a lean 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete output structure with exact file paths and a per-domain file spec ("current state (with file:line refs), target state, migration steps, testing strategy... rollback plan, and success metrics"), plus an explicit MUST DO / MUST NOT DO list. Execution detail is delegated to reference files, leaving minor gaps versus fully copy-paste-ready guidance, but appropriate for a planning skill. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear two-phase sequence (RESEARCH then PLAN) with eight numbered steps and per-phase output directories. Validation is mostly present via the non-negotiable "Never start PLAN without completing RESEARCH" gate and per-step rollback requirements, but explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops (verify-findings -> fix -> retry) are implied rather than staged, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is a genuine overview with a well-signaled one-level-deep reference table ("Load When" column), all six referenced files exist in references/, and content is appropriately split across research-phase, plan-phase, assessment-framework, strangler-fig-patterns, frontend-backend-strategies, and testing-safety-nets. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |