Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable overview with excellent progressive disclosure — a concise SKILL.md routing to six real reference files via a Load-When table. Its main weaknesses are redundancy between Core Principles and Constraints, and the absence of explicit intra-phase validation/feedback checkpoints in the workflow.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the 'Core Principles' and 'MUST DO / MUST NOT DO' sections so each directive appears once; cross-reference the principles from Constraints instead of restating them.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint at the end of the RESEARCH phase (e.g., a checklist confirming dependency-map, domain-candidates, stack-research, and risk-assessment files are complete and cited) before PLAN may begin.
Add a brief feedback-loop note for when a recommendation cannot be verified via web search/context7 (e.g., 'if unverifiable, mark as unverified assumption and ask the user') to give the workflow an explicit error-recovery path.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the 'Core Principles' and 'Constraints (MUST DO / MUST NOT DO)' sections restate the same directives ('Research every technology', 'Cite file:line', 'Ask the user', 'Never guess acronyms') twice, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill it gives concrete, executable guidance: specific output paths ('./migration-plan/research/', './migration-plan/domains/'), per-file naming, and an explicit required contents list per domain file ('current state with file:line refs, target state, migration steps, testing strategy, rollback plan, and success metrics'). | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The two-phase RESEARCH → PLAN sequence with 8 numbered steps and the explicit gate 'Never start PLAN without completing RESEARCH' is clear, but there are no intra-phase validation checkpoints or error-recovery feedback loops, leaving validation implicit beyond the single phase gate. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that points to one-level-deep references via a well-signaled 'Reference Guide' table with a 'Load When' column, and all six referenced files (research-phase.md, assessment-framework.md, plan-phase.md, strangler-fig-patterns.md, frontend-backend-strategies.md, testing-safety-nets.md) exist in references/, matching the clear-overview anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |