Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, actionable launch playbook dense with current, non-obvious platform data, timing specifics, and benchmarks, supported by well-signaled reference files. Its main weaknesses are mild: inlined time-sensitive statements that lack a deprecated-section home and some long landscape tables better suited to the references.
Suggestions
Move hard 2025-2026 dates and the G2/Capterra acquisition note into a clearly marked 'Currency / caveats' or deprecated-style subsection so time-sensitive claims don't penalize conciseness and age visibly.
Relocate the large platform landscape tables (Discovery/Developer/Indie/AI/Social/Content/Paid) into a reference file, keeping a condensed summary inline to tighten SKILL.md and sharpen progressive disclosure.
Surface the quick-reference.md pointer earlier (e.g. in a 'Before Starting / checklists' callout) rather than after Troubleshooting, and frame key decision gates (title testing, hn.algolia check, 30-min comment SLA) as explicit validate-checkpoints in the launch sequence.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly high-value, non-obvious domain data (2025-2026 platform specifics, timing windows, benchmarks) rather than concepts Claude already knows, but inlined time-sensitive claims ('2025-2026', 'G2 acquiring Capterra... Q1 2026') and some table redundancy with references keep it from fully lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly concrete and directly applicable guidance — exact times ('12:01 AM PT', '8:00-10:00 AM PT'), title char counts, worked title formulas, referral reward tiers, named tools with URLs, and benchmark ranges cover the common launch cases copy-paste ready. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced Week -4 to Week +4 framework with timing detail and a troubleshooting cause/fix section, but explicit validate-checkpoints in the main sequence are scattered rather than structured (e.g. 'Test with 5-10 people', 'Check hn.algolia.com before posting' appear but aren't framed as checkpoints). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Two real one-level-deep references (directories-timing-mistakes.md, quick-reference.md) are clearly signaled with content context, but the long platform landscape tables are inlined in SKILL.md when they could live partly in references, and the quick-reference pointer is somewhat buried after troubleshooting. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |