Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-structured strategy document with concrete timings, examples, and real one-level-deep references. Its weaknesses are moderate: time-sensitive 2025/2026 claims sit in the main flow instead of a clearly-bounded section, and the deep-dive platform sections inflate SKILL.md when they should be split into the existing references.
Suggestions
Move the Product Hunt, Hacker News, and Waitlist 'Deep Dive' sections into the references/ files (or a new reference), keeping SKILL.md to the platform landscape, launch sequence, examples, and troubleshooting — this addresses the progressive_disclosure gap.
Isolate time-sensitive claims ('2025-2026 Algorithm,' 'Performance Benchmarks (2025),' the G2/Capterra acquisition note) in a clearly-labeled section so stale data is easy to spot and update.
Trim persona framing ('You are a product launch strategist who has studied hundreds of successful launches') and editorial asides ('Early velocity is everything,' 'This is the target') to tighten conciseness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly dense, useful tables and benchmarks rather than explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but it could be tightened: persona padding ('You are a product launch strategist who has studied hundreds of successful launches'), editorial asides ('Early velocity is everything,' 'This is the target'), and time-sensitive claims ('2025-2026 Algorithm,' 'Performance Benchmarks (2025),' 'closing Q1 2026') are not isolated in an old-patterns/deprecated section as the guidelines require. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully concrete, executable guidance throughout: exact timing ('12:01 AM PT,' '8:00-10:00 AM PT'), good/bad title examples, referral reward tiers, named tools (hn.algolia.com, LaunchList, Viral Loops), numeric benchmarks, and problem→cause→fix troubleshooting. Specific examples cover the common cases for this instruction-only skill. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Launch Sequence Framework gives a clear week-by-week sequence, 'Before Starting' mandates gathering inputs ('If the user has not provided these, ask before building the plan'), roles are assigned, and Troubleshooting provides feedback loops. Not a 5 because some checkpoints are implicit (e.g., no explicit gate like 'confirm waitlist size target before Week -1' or verify-supporters-confirmed step). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Both bundle references exist and are clearly signaled at the right points ('read references/directories-timing-mistakes.md,' 'read references/quick-reference.md'), one level deep. However, the ~340-line body inlines three 'Deep Dive' sections and a full waitlist playbook that clearly belong in the reference files — the pattern the anchor-3 example describes. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |