Inspect Sentry issues, summarize production errors, and pull health data via the Sentry API (read-only). Use when user says "check Sentry", "what errors in production?", "summarize Sentry issues", "recent crashes", or "production error report". Requires SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN. Do NOT use for setting up Sentry SDK, configuring alerts, or non-Sentry error monitoring.
86
82%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is an excellent skill description that hits all the marks. It provides specific concrete actions, includes natural trigger terms users would actually say, explicitly addresses both what and when, and clearly delineates its boundaries with negative use cases. The inclusion of prerequisites (SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN) and exclusions further strengthens its utility for skill selection.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Inspect Sentry issues', 'summarize production errors', 'pull health data via the Sentry API (read-only)'. Also specifies what it does NOT do, adding further clarity. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (inspect issues, summarize errors, pull health data) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when...' clause with multiple trigger phrases). Also includes negative boundaries ('Do NOT use for...'), which further strengthens completeness. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural trigger terms users would say: 'check Sentry', 'what errors in production?', 'summarize Sentry issues', 'recent crashes', 'production error report'. These are realistic phrases a user would naturally use. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive by naming 'Sentry' specifically, specifying read-only API access, and explicitly excluding SDK setup, alert configuration, and non-Sentry monitoring. This creates a very clear niche with minimal conflict risk. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
64%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a solid, actionable skill with clear executable commands for each Sentry API task. Its main weaknesses are some redundancy (defaults repeated in multiple sections, API endpoints listed despite being handled by the script) and missing validation/error-handling guidance in the workflow. The structure is reasonable but could benefit from splitting reference material into separate files.
Suggestions
Add explicit error handling steps: what to do when the token is invalid (401), when the org/project is not found (404), or when rate limits are hit (429).
Remove the duplicated API endpoints section since the bundled script already handles these — or move it to a separate REFERENCE.md file.
Consolidate the 'Inputs and defaults' section with the defaults mentioned in 'Quick start' to avoid repetition.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary content like explaining how to create auth tokens (step-by-step Sentry UI instructions) and repeating default values in multiple sections. The API endpoints section duplicates what the script already handles. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable bash commands with clear arguments for each task. The commands are copy-paste ready with explicit flags, and the script path setup is concrete. Each core task has a specific, runnable example. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The core tasks are clearly sequenced (list issues → resolve short ID → issue detail → events → event detail), but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or error recovery steps. For example, there's no guidance on what to do if the API returns errors, if the token is invalid, or if the script fails. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References the bundled script `scripts/sentry_api.py` appropriately, but the skill itself is somewhat monolithic — the output formatting rules, API endpoints, and input defaults could be in a separate reference file. There are no links to additional documentation files for advanced usage. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
81e7e0d
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.