CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

sentry

Inspect Sentry issues, summarize production errors, and pull health data via the Sentry API (read-only). Use when user says "check Sentry", "what errors in production?", "summarize Sentry issues", "recent crashes", or "production error report". Requires SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN. Do NOT use for setting up Sentry SDK, configuring alerts, or non-Sentry error monitoring.

86

Quality

82%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Discovery

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is an excellent skill description that hits all the marks. It provides specific concrete actions, natural trigger terms users would actually say, explicit 'Use when' and 'Do NOT use' clauses, and clear boundaries that distinguish it from related skills like Sentry SDK setup or general error monitoring. The inclusion of the SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN requirement and negative scope boundaries are particularly strong touches.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Inspect Sentry issues', 'summarize production errors', 'pull health data via the Sentry API (read-only)'. Also specifies what it does NOT do, adding further clarity.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (inspect issues, summarize errors, pull health data) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when' clause with multiple trigger phrases). Also includes negative boundaries ('Do NOT use for...'), which further strengthens completeness.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Excellent coverage of natural trigger terms users would say: 'check Sentry', 'what errors in production?', 'summarize Sentry issues', 'recent crashes', 'production error report'. These are realistic phrases a user would naturally use.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Highly distinctive — scoped specifically to Sentry API read-only operations, with explicit exclusions for SDK setup, alert configuration, and non-Sentry monitoring. Very unlikely to conflict with other skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Implementation

64%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a solid, actionable skill with clear executable commands and good structure for each core task. Its main weaknesses are some redundancy (defaults stated multiple times, API endpoints listed despite being abstracted by the script) and missing validation/error-handling guidance for when API calls fail or return unexpected results. The auth token setup instructions, while helpful for users, add bulk that could be more concise.

Suggestions

Remove the duplicated API endpoints section since the script already abstracts these, or move it to a separate REFERENCE.md file

Add explicit error handling guidance: what to do when the script fails, returns empty results, or the token is invalid/expired

Consolidate the defaults—they're stated in both the 'Quick start' section and the 'Inputs and defaults' section; pick one location

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Generally efficient but includes some unnecessary content like explaining how to create auth tokens (step-by-step Sentry UI instructions) and repeating defaults in multiple places. The API endpoints section duplicates what the script already abstracts.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides fully executable bash commands with clear arguments for each core task. The script path setup, command examples with flags, and specific API endpoints are all copy-paste ready and concrete.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The core tasks are clearly sequenced (list issues → resolve short ID → issue detail → events → event detail), but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or error recovery steps. The skill mentions the script 'retries once on transient errors' but doesn't describe what to do when calls fail or return unexpected results.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

References a bundled script (`scripts/sentry_api.py`) which is good separation, but the SKILL.md itself is somewhat monolithic—the API requirements section, output formatting rules, and golden test inputs could potentially be in separate reference files. However, the content is reasonably organized with clear section headers.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
tech-leads-club/agent-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.