Inspect Sentry issues, summarize production errors, and pull health data via the Sentry API (read-only). Use when user says "check Sentry", "what errors in production?", "summarize Sentry issues", "recent crashes", or "production error report". Requires SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN. Do NOT use for setting up Sentry SDK, configuring alerts, or non-Sentry error monitoring.
86
82%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is an excellent skill description that hits all the marks. It provides specific concrete actions, natural trigger terms users would actually say, explicit 'Use when' and 'Do NOT use' clauses, and clear boundaries that distinguish it from related skills like Sentry SDK setup or general error monitoring. The inclusion of the SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN requirement and negative scope boundaries are particularly strong touches.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Inspect Sentry issues', 'summarize production errors', 'pull health data via the Sentry API (read-only)'. Also specifies what it does NOT do, adding further clarity. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (inspect issues, summarize errors, pull health data) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when' clause with multiple trigger phrases). Also includes negative boundaries ('Do NOT use for...'), which further strengthens completeness. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural trigger terms users would say: 'check Sentry', 'what errors in production?', 'summarize Sentry issues', 'recent crashes', 'production error report'. These are realistic phrases a user would naturally use. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive — scoped specifically to Sentry API read-only operations, with explicit exclusions for SDK setup, alert configuration, and non-Sentry monitoring. Very unlikely to conflict with other skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
64%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a solid, actionable skill with clear executable commands and good structure for each core task. Its main weaknesses are some redundancy (defaults stated multiple times, API endpoints listed despite being abstracted by the script) and missing validation/error-handling guidance for when API calls fail or return unexpected results. The auth token setup instructions, while helpful for users, add bulk that could be more concise.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicated API endpoints section since the script already abstracts these, or move it to a separate REFERENCE.md file
Add explicit error handling guidance: what to do when the script fails, returns empty results, or the token is invalid/expired
Consolidate the defaults—they're stated in both the 'Quick start' section and the 'Inputs and defaults' section; pick one location
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Generally efficient but includes some unnecessary content like explaining how to create auth tokens (step-by-step Sentry UI instructions) and repeating defaults in multiple places. The API endpoints section duplicates what the script already abstracts. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable bash commands with clear arguments for each core task. The script path setup, command examples with flags, and specific API endpoints are all copy-paste ready and concrete. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The core tasks are clearly sequenced (list issues → resolve short ID → issue detail → events → event detail), but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or error recovery steps. The skill mentions the script 'retries once on transient errors' but doesn't describe what to do when calls fail or return unexpected results. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References a bundled script (`scripts/sentry_api.py`) which is good separation, but the SKILL.md itself is somewhat monolithic—the API requirements section, output formatting rules, and golden test inputs could potentially be in separate reference files. However, the content is reasonably organized with clear section headers. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
906a57d
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.