content-quality-auditor

Use when the user asks to "audit content quality", "EEAT score", "content quality check", "CORE-EEAT audit", "how good is my content", "is my content good enough to rank", "EEAT check", or "rate my content quality". Runs a full CORE-EEAT 80-item content quality audit, scoring content across 8 dimensions with weighted scoring by content type. Produces a detailed report with per-item scores, dimension analysis, and a prioritized action plan. For SEO-specific page checks, see on-page-seo-auditor. For domain-level assessment, see domain-authority-auditor.

Quality

86%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Quality

Content

73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body delivers a thorough, well-sequenced audit workflow with strong validation checkpoints and copy-paste report templates. Its main weaknesses are token padding from the duplicated 80-item table and cross-skill promotional blocks, plus reliance on an external reference file for per-item criteria.

Suggestions

Remove the inlined 80-item reference table (lines 213–254) and rely on the one-level-deep link to references/core-eeat-benchmark.md to cut significant duplicated tokens.

Drop or collapse the 'SEO & GEO Skills Library' and 'Browse all 20 skills' promotional blocks, which do not advance the audit task and consume context budget.

Bundle references/core-eeat-benchmark.md inside ./references/ (or inline the per-item Pass/Partial/Fail criteria) so the skill is self-contained without an external repo-level dependency.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly efficient but carries padding — the inlined 80-item reference table (lines 213–254) duplicates content already promised in references/core-eeat-benchmark.md, and the promotional 'Browse all 20 skills' / 'SEO & GEO Skills Library' blocks add tokens that do not serve the audit task.	3 / 5
Actionability	Concrete, copy-paste-ready report templates, explicit scoring rules (Pass=10/Partial=5/Fail=0), weighted-score formulas, and a worked example give mostly executable guidance; the minor gap is that the per-item evaluation criteria themselves are deferred to the external benchmark reference rather than inlined.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clear four-step sequence (Preparation → CORE Audit → EEAT Audit → Scoring & Report) with a veto emergency-brake, dedicated Input/Output validation checklists, and an N/A re-normalization feedback loop for insufficient data, matching the top anchor.	5 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Well-sectioned overview (When to Use, What It Does, How to Use, Instructions, Validation, Example) with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references; the primary benchmark reference is repo-level external and no bundle files ship in ./references, so structure is good but not perfectly self-contained.	4 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is a strong, third-person trigger-rich statement that clearly defines both capability and invocation conditions, with explicit disambiguation against sibling skills. It hits the top anchor on every dimension with no padding or over-claims.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple concrete actions — 'Runs a full CORE-EEAT 80-item content quality audit, scoring content across 8 dimensions with weighted scoring by content type' and 'Produces a detailed report with per-item scores, dimension analysis, and a prioritized action plan' — giving comprehensive, specific coverage rather than generic language.	5 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both what ('Runs a full CORE-EEAT 80-item audit…') and when (the 'Use when the user asks to…' clause with concrete trigger phrases), meeting the top anchor on both halves.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Provides comprehensive natural trigger phrases a user would actually say — 'audit content quality', 'EEAT score', 'how good is my content', 'is my content good enough to rank', 'rate my content quality' — including synonyms and variations.	5 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Occupies a clear niche (CORE-EEAT content audit) and adds explicit boundary guidance — 'For SEO-specific page checks, see on-page-seo-auditor. For domain-level assessment, see domain-authority-auditor' — minimizing conflict risk.	5 / 5
	Total	20 / 20 Passed

Validation

81%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
metadata_field	'metadata' should map string keys to string values	Warning
relative_links	Relative link issues: 37 suspicious	Warning
referenced_paths_exist	Referenced path issues: 2 missing	Warning

	Total	13 / 16 Passed

Repository: teeclaw/phorm-nft
Path: .agents/skills/content-quality-auditor/SKILL.md
Commit: 02adecb

Reviewed: ~8 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.