Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is actionable, well-structured, and appropriately concise, with executable commands and a clear two-terminal workflow plus a numbered sync procedure. Minor gains are possible from adding an explicit verification step after rebuilding the ui-server.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation/verification step after rebuilding the ui-server (e.g. confirm it starts and serves HTTP on :7243) before declaring the sync complete.
Consider tightening the 'Why not pnpm dev?' and ui-server proto-descriptor paragraphs so only the non-obvious insight remains.
Replace the <branch-name> and <version> placeholders with a brief inline note on how to discover the correct value, to make the sync steps fully self-contained.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence (direct commands, minimal preamble); the ui-server proto-descriptor explanation is justified because it is non-obvious, but it could be trimmed slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands cover the common cases including branch-specific builds (make start, git checkout, go get, go build, pnpm dev:local-temporal), with only minor placeholder fields. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear two-terminal sequence and a numbered sync workflow are present with explicit restart-after-rebuild guidance; it lacks a formal validation checkpoint, though the operation is not destructive so the cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single, well-organized file under ~55 lines with clear section headers and no external references needed, fitting the simple-skill exception for high progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |