CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

review-copyable-snippets

Review a change to a code block a reader is meant to copy — a workflow, command, config file, or manifest embedded in documentation — for whether it works as printed. Use as one lens in a code review run.

68

Quality

82%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A tight, well-structured instruction-only review lens that is concise and clearly organized with actionable, specific checks. The only meaningful gaps are the absence of a worked example and an explicit iteration step over multiple changed blocks, which cap actionability and workflow clarity just below the top.

Suggestions

Add one short worked example showing a copyable block, the failing input, and the corrected line, to lift actionability toward 5.

Make iteration over multiple changed blocks explicit in the Method (e.g., 'for each changed block, ... then compare across the change for divergent copies') to add an explicit sequencing checkpoint.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — no padding, no explaining what a code block or config file is, and every section (Scope, Method, Threshold, Reporting) earns its tokens.

5 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete checks — 'resolve every expression... ask what the expression evaluates to when a field is absent' and 'unset variable, an empty match, and a path containing a space' — that are specific and actionable, though as instruction-only guidance it lacks a worked copy-paste example that would reach 5.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The Method reads as a clear ordered procedure (read block as runtime, resolve expressions / trace edge cases, compare prose, check for divergent copies) with the Threshold and Reporting sections acting as a checklist; it lacks an explicit iteration/validation loop over multiple blocks, keeping it just below 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A simple, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no external references and clean, well-organized sections, which the simple-skill exception lets score 5 on progressive disclosure.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A focused, concrete description that clearly states what it does and when to use it with natural trigger terms and a distinct niche. The main gap is richer trigger-phrase synonyms and a slightly fuller 'when' clause, which keep it just below the top of the completeness and trigger-term scales.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names a concrete domain (copyable code blocks in docs) and the artifact types (workflow, command, config, manifest) with the core action 'Review a change... for whether it works as printed'; it lists several specific targets but centers on a single review action, sitting above the 3 anchor but not quite the multi-action breadth of 5.

4 / 5

Completeness

It states both what the skill does ('Review a change to a code block... for whether it works as printed') and when to use it ('Use as one lens in a code review run'); the 'when' is explicit but thin relative to the concrete-trigger richness of the 5 anchor, so it sits at 4.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrases a user would say — 'code block a reader is meant to copy', 'documentation', 'code review run' — giving good keyword coverage, though it lacks broader synonyms or file-extension triggers that would reach 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It carves a clear niche — copyable code blocks embedded in documentation, used as a code-review lens — with distinct triggers and minimal overlap with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
tesslio/product-plugins
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.