Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplarily lean instruction-only skill: a clear scope taxonomy, a sequenced review method, explicit report/don't-report thresholds, and a concrete reporting format. The only meaningful gap is the absence of a worked example showing one finding in the prescribed reporting format.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section (Scope, Method, Threshold, Reporting) carries distinct operational weight, matching the 'every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The guidance is concrete for an instruction-only skill: four named defect categories ("Internal agreement", "Substituted outcomes", etc.), a sequenced method, and a reporting format ("Name the instruction ... Quote the statement it disagrees with, and its file"). It stops short of the 5 anchor because no worked example of a finding is given to anchor the reporting format. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Method section sequences the review clearly ("Start from what the change asserts ... Then follow the changed instruction as an agent would, in order") and the Threshold section supplies explicit include/exclude checkpoints plus a boundary handoff to "Copyable Snippets". It lacks the explicit validation/feedback loop of the 5 anchor, though no destructive-operation cap applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no bundle files and no need for external references; its four well-organized sections (Scope, Method, Threshold, Reporting) fully satisfy the simple-skill exception for a top progressive-disclosure score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |