Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, exemplary router: the body adds only what a router must contribute (sequencing, load conditions, authorization boundaries, feedback loop) and delegates all stage detail to the loaded skills. No padding, no gaps in the sequence, and appropriately small for its scope.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~28-line body is lean with zero padding: every line is a routing rule, a load condition, or a contract constraint. No concepts Claude already knows are explained ('Mentioning a skill or paraphrasing it is not equivalent to loading it' is a behavioral rule, not a concept explainer). | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Instruction-only skill with fully actionable guidance: named skills to load verbatim ('writing-plans', 'systematic-debugging', 'verification-before-completion'), exact load conditions, a concrete alternative for the narrow case ('record a concise working plan instead'), and specific prohibitions ('Never push, merge, open a pull request, or delete a worktree without explicit authorization'). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 1–6 sequence is explicit with an ordering rationale, a validation gate ('verification-before-completion' before claiming completion), and a feedback loop (step 5: if findings, load 'receiving-code-review', address them, and return to verification). Evidence retention is required at each stage. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references — the detail lives in the stage skills it routes to, not in this bundle. Two well-organized sections ('Required stage loading', 'Routing contract') satisfy the simple-skill exception; no bundle files exist to misorganize. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |